Spanish conquistador Francisco Pizarro invaded the Incas in 1532. Him and his men plagued the inca members with disease and war.
Answer:
The options are
A. Environmental disasters made farming difficult.
B. Large animals were trained to assist with farmwork.
C. Most herds of animals crossed the land bridge to Asia.
D. Large mammals such as mammoths began to die out.
The answer is D. Large mammals such as mammoths began to die out .
In the past, ancient Americans were known to hunt big mammals such as mammoths for food but at a point in time this animals began to die out.
This led to some adjustments such as hunting small animals and gathering more plants to survive,
Answer:
C. the spread of disease.
Explanation:
Adequate water and sewage systems are characteristics of modern urban centers. They became part of standard urban planning and management only in the late 19th century and early 20th century. The lack of such systems means unsanitary conditions and high probabilities of disease spread. We can still see public health problems originated in inadequate sewage and water systems in many developing countries.
Answer:
In <u>500</u> <u>Bce</u> the Greek city-states on the western coast of Anatolia rose up in rebellion against Persia. This uprising, known as the Ionian revolt (500–494 bce), failed, but its consequences for the mainland Greeks were momentous.
Explanation:
Although the Greeks were often heavily outnumbered, they generally had better tactics, organization and technology than the Persians. ... The usual result of battles were that the Persians would suffer massive casualties against the well armed and well organized Greeks while the Greeks would suffer negligible casualties. What did the Greek city-states do to defend themselves against Persian invaders? ... In preparation for the attack, some of the Greek states formed a defensive league under the SPARTANS. The athenians, however, followed a new military policy insisted on by Themistocles, one of the Athenian leaders, and built a navy.
Brainliest? :D
The expression or holding of opinions at variance with those previously, commonly, or officially held.
