La respuesta correcta a esta pregunta abierta es la siguiente.
Las principales diferencias entre el estado de derecho liberal y el estado social de derecho son estas.
El Estado de Derecho Liberal surge a consecuencia de los regímenes absolutistas que dominaron por un tiempo en distintas naciones que tenían monarquías absolutas, en donde el poder del rey era supremo e incuestionable. El Estado Liberal considera que las libertades de los ciudadanos son necesarias en un régimen de participación democrática y en donde existe una separación de poderes que garantice a justicia y facilite una economía basada en el libre mercado.
El Estado Social de Derecho busca dar prioridad al bienestar social de las personas, en lugar de poner énfasis en modelos económicos liberales. El Estado social se enfoca más en la igualdad social, el reparto más equitativo de la riqueza y el trato justo a los trabajadores.
Answer: When the Panama Canal was created by the U.S. government between 1904 and 1914, they decided to build a lock canal. And that meant that, in effect, every ship that passes through the Panama Canal goes up effectively three steps to 85 feet above sea level. There’s a large dam that blocked the original flow of the Chagres River towards the Caribbean, and then water flows through the locks with the ships. So it’s a massive lake that was created primarily to move ships through the oceans, but when they did that, of course they flooded the entire region. So the entire Chagres River valley, which was a place where there were many small Panamanian communities, was flooded. And a lot of the kind of natural history of the region was lost in the flooding of the canal as well.
Explanation: hope this helps, sorry if its wrong and have a nice day
Imperialism , let me know if if right
Answer:
The best-known power of the Supreme Court is judicial review, or the ability of the Court to declare a Legislative or Executive act in violation of the Constitution, is not found within the text of the Constitution itself. The Court established this doctrine in the case of Marbury v.
It’s either one or two. Sorry I don’t know but I know that the problem with articles of confederation was that they had a weak central government.
