There may be more than one way in which to answer this question. I will assume that the "equation" is a linear one: f(x) = mx + b.
Then (16/3) = m(1) + b
This is one equation in two unknowns, so it does not have a unique solution. Was there more to this problem than you have shared?
If we assume that the y-intercept (b) is zero, then y = mx, and
16/3 = 1m, so that m = 16/3, and so y = (16/3)x.
Answer:
miguel
Step-by-step explanation:
no explanation needed
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
The experimental probability is the chance of an event happening based on data, or rather the experiment results, and not on a theoretical calculation. In essence, a theoretical calculation can be described by the following formula:

However, the experimental probability can be described with the following formula:

The number of trials is the sum of the number of outcomes. In this case, the desired outcome is tails. Therefore, the experimental probability can be described using the following formula:

One can also rewrite the formula as the following. This is because the total is the sum of the number of the two outcomes:

Substitute,

Simplify,

Rewrite as a decimal:

3/9<3/8<3/7.
When we have fractions with same numerator, and and different denominators, the fraction that have the lowest denomiator will be the greatest while the one with the highest denomiator will be the smallest.
Answer:
Your simplified fraction would be 12 6/7 so I’d say *C* because that’s the closest to the simplified fraction
Step-by-step explanation:
im just explain