The answer that is not true is A: "Scott could only sue in state courts."
Whether Dred Scott, as a slave, had any legal right to sue in court was a matter that applied whether talking about state or federal courts. When Scott's suit was rejected by a state of Missouri court, Scott and his supporters managed to bring the case into a federal court, and it went all the way to the Supreme Court. Though the Supreme Court at the time ruled that Scott had no right to bring the suit because he was a slave and not a citizen (point D above), the case gave Chief Justice Roger Taney opportunity to make further statements regarding the slavery issue, including points B and C in your list above.
Answer:
The answer to this question is A
Answer:
selling indulgences
Explanation:
Luther was most opposed to the idea of people absolving sins through indulgences. Indulgences are payments people make to the church that forgives all sins and "guarantees" their path to heaven. Luther wrote about how this was wrong in the 95 theses as it went against what God said.
Chastity, obedience, and poverty!!!!
They are organized around issues relating to Economic Interest
