1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ainat [17]
3 years ago
12

All of the following are true of the Dred Scott v. Sandford except A. Scott could only sue in state courts. B. living in a free

state did not make a slave free. C. the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional. D. slaves had no rights as a citizen.
History
2 answers:
leonid [27]3 years ago
6 0

The correct answer is A


vlada-n [284]3 years ago
5 0
The answer that is not true is A:  "Scott could only sue in state courts."

Whether Dred Scott, as a slave, had any legal right to sue in court was a matter that applied whether talking about state or federal courts.  When Scott's suit was rejected by a state of Missouri court, Scott and his supporters managed to bring the case into a federal court, and it went all the way to the Supreme Court.  Though the Supreme Court at the time ruled that Scott had no right to bring the suit because he was a slave and not a citizen (point D above), the case gave Chief Justice Roger Taney opportunity to make further statements regarding the slavery issue, including points B and C in your list above.
You might be interested in
Civic isues of your locality
lapo4ka [179]

Answer:

They are :

•collection of garbage on roads and footpaths.

•scarcity of clean drinking water.

•construction of illegal shops and huts over pavement.

Explanation:

hope this helps you dear.

3 0
3 years ago
Ordeno cronológicamente los siguientes hechos y los situo en una linea de tiempo
zhannawk [14.2K]

MY NAME IS JUAN RODRIGO LOPEZ AND PEOPLE SAY I AM RACIST FOR THIs

7 0
3 years ago
Which of these completes the graphic organizer?
Kitty [74]

Answer: C

Explanation:

The series of acts British Parliament passes in 1774 in reaction to the Boston Tea Party came to be known in the American colonies as the Intolerable Acts.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
1. At Monmouth, what did the Continental soldiers demonstrate?
IRINA_888 [86]

Answer:

Monmouth demonstrated that the soldiers training at Valley Forge improved their discipline under fire.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
What was the goal of trust-busting in the early 1900s?
dlinn [17]

Answer:

The gold of the trust-busting in the early 1900s was eliminate or regulate those business, which due to their increasing fraudulent actions like intimidation and bribing, were becoming and impediment to a free market economy.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did some southern black people try to resist and escape the jim crow laws
    8·1 answer
  • Which of the following is an example of how life began to change in the United States in the 1920s
    9·1 answer
  • What country did husband queen victoria come from?
    10·1 answer
  • What specific foreign policy goals/initiatives did Candidate Trump run on and why did that resonate with his base.
    13·1 answer
  • La instauracion imperialismo
    14·1 answer
  • 2. When was Jesus crucified?
    5·1 answer
  • What are oromo's cultural values?​
    14·1 answer
  • American families are different today than they were in the past in that now they are generally
    9·1 answer
  • १३. तल दिइएकामध्ये कुनै एक शीर्षकमा निबन्ध लेख्नुहोस् । (१०)
    10·1 answer
  • True or False: Washington felt the President was more important than Congress.What evidence supports this?
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!