1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Ainat [17]
3 years ago
12

All of the following are true of the Dred Scott v. Sandford except A. Scott could only sue in state courts. B. living in a free

state did not make a slave free. C. the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional. D. slaves had no rights as a citizen.
History
2 answers:
leonid [27]3 years ago
6 0

The correct answer is A


vlada-n [284]3 years ago
5 0
The answer that is not true is A:  "Scott could only sue in state courts."

Whether Dred Scott, as a slave, had any legal right to sue in court was a matter that applied whether talking about state or federal courts.  When Scott's suit was rejected by a state of Missouri court, Scott and his supporters managed to bring the case into a federal court, and it went all the way to the Supreme Court.  Though the Supreme Court at the time ruled that Scott had no right to bring the suit because he was a slave and not a citizen (point D above), the case gave Chief Justice Roger Taney opportunity to make further statements regarding the slavery issue, including points B and C in your list above.
You might be interested in
What impact did the verdict in claudettes case have on her community
velikii [3]

whether she would be imprisoned

4 0
3 years ago
Who allied with France against Britain in the French and Indian War?
kkurt [141]

Answer:

B. British colonies .that is the answer

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What happened when Lee Yick appealed his conviction for running an illegal laundry in San Francisco to the U.S. Supreme Court?
Norma-Jean [14]
C. The Supreme Court decided that authorities had unfairly singled him out because of his race. This was because Lee Yick had worked in a laundromat for twenty years and it was illegal at the time that laundromats were to be built in wooden rooms. However, ninety-five percent of laundromats were in wooden complexes and only some of them were Chinese-owned, while others were owned by other races. However, Lee Yick was singled out and the Supreme Court ruled that although the law said it was race-blind, it in fact was judging him based on his race.
6 0
3 years ago
which of these early historians where more concerned with clearly presenting fact than telling an interesting story
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]
The answer is tacitus
5 0
3 years ago
What is the term part of the ocean or sea that cuts far into the boarding land mass
love history [14]
The part of the ocean or sea that cuts far into the adjacent land mass is often referred to as a "shelf" or "plateau", since it is simply an extension of the land mass that makes up the area above the water. 
3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which was the most recent group to invade northern india?
    14·1 answer
  • How was a successor to Muhammad chosen?
    8·2 answers
  • What were the groups within the third estate
    15·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ASAP!
    6·1 answer
  • What did the Northwest Ordinance prohibit in the Northwest Territory?
    9·1 answer
  • How were conglomerates and franchises alike and different
    9·1 answer
  • 2. How is a city-state different from an empire?
    6·2 answers
  • Has a literacy rate of 99.8%
    10·1 answer
  • As Americans began to build new governments after the Revolution, they agreed the governments would be ______.
    6·1 answer
  • The origin of the word for slave comes for the word Slav, a group of white Eastern Europeans.
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!