Answer:
The protester can constitutionally be convicted for frustrated arson since he only lit and burnt the tool.
Explanation:
Arson can be destructive. As a crime, arson is grievous and hateful. There is inherent and manifest wickedness in committing arson, which is a federal crime. Destructive arson carries a life sentence. The protest looks like a desperate demonstration of unsound mental health. However, the protester will be convicted for frustrated arson, which carries a reduced sentence.
Believing that you are greater than another
Answer:Then be both you should do research I'm sure being a lawyer entails something with writing, if not when you get to college major in the one you like the most and minor in the other, give it a year or a few months and find which one you like the best
Explanation:
A charter of liberties to which the English barons forced King John to give his assent in June 1215 at Runnymede. a document constituting a fundamental guarantee of rights and privileges. The importance is The Magna Carta, meaning “Great Charter,” is one of the most influential political documents ever written: it is seen by many modern political scientists as the fundamental document for many of the governing laws of the west, including the United States. Originally issued in 1215 by King John of England as a way of dealing with his own political crisis, the Magna Carta was the first governmental decree establishing the principle that all people—including the king—were equally subject to the law. Several of the natural rights and legal protections enumerated in both the state declarations of rights and the United States Bill of Rights descend from rights protected by Magna Carta. A few of these include:
Freedom from unlawful searches and seizures
The right to a speedy trial
A right to a jury trial in both criminal and civil cases
Protection from loss of life, liberty, or property without due process of law
Hope this helps *smiles*
The fourth amendment protects the right of the people to be safe and secure in their own homes, and effects against unreasonable search and seizure. I agree with these restrictions on collecting evidence because the officer must issue a warrant upon probable cause in order to search someone’s home.