Answer: d. All of the above
Explanation:
Some crimes are quite complicated in structure to solve as they leave little evidence to enable the police to capitalize on and solve.
Police response is also reactive which means that they cannot prevent crime per say, they can only try to solve it. This puts them at a disadvantage because they are essentially a step behind the criminals which means they have to do more to catch up than the criminal has to do to escape.
Police powers are also quite limited especially in a democratic nation like the United States because they have to abide by certain rules. For instance, if a search and seizure is illegal, regardless of if incriminating evidence is found, the criminal has a good chance of being freed. These rules make solving crimes difficult sometimes because some crimes cannot be solved conventionally.
It would be more dangerous if the cars bounced off. This is because the airbags will deploy if the car stops, leaving them only with the injuries they have. However, if they bounce off, they can hit additional cars or accidently fall off a cliff. The damage opportunity is worse if they bounce off.
I hope this helps! :)
Answer: The legitimate answer would be to prevent crimes.
Explanation: But in the United States of America, laws are created by politicians may choose ideology.
1.Margret can say as she was in a hurry that's why the mistake took place.
Explanation:
Margret can say that as she had to avail another connecting flight thus she was in a hurry , so my mistake instead of taking her laptop he took someone else. If they want to know regarding the matter they can go to the airport and can check the lost list. After knowing the fact Margret must have informed it to the airport.
2.Success rate is more in case of Margret case.
Explanation:
Prosecutors as well as police don't charge cases until and unless they get proper evidence of that particular incidents. According to the prosecutors until and unless more evidence occur the accused cannot be convicted.
