Answer:
D. $62.17
Explanation:
To get to this conclusion you just have to add 18.62 with 43.55 to get 62.17.
Answer:
D) Adults do not contract influenza primarily from children who have influenza.
Explanation:
The conclusion from this argument is that there is no health benefit for the nasal spray vaccine since it was designed to be administered to children, but children rarely get influenza.
The only assumption that strengthens this conclusion is that children do not pass influenza to adults.
- If this is true, plus the fact that children rarely get influenza, then why would anyone need an influenza vaccine for children.
- If this assumption was false and children passed influenza to adults, then the conclusion would be wrong because a vaccine would be necessary to prevent children from passing influenza.
Answer:
Company HD pays less in taxes
Explanation:
In the case when the company HD and LD have the similar rate of tax, sales revenue, etc even both have favorable net incomes also the company Hd contains greater debt ratio due to which it has more interest expense so that means company hd would pay less taxes
Therefore the above represent the answer
and, this is the answer but the same is not provided in the given options
Answer:
Date Account title Debit Credit
12/31/2019 Lease Receivable $175,934
Cost of Goods sold $120,000
Sales Revenue $175,934
Inventory $120,000
Date Account title Debit Credit
12/31/2019 Cash $40,800
Deposit Liability $40,800
The rental amount is constant and is made on the first day of the lease period so this is an annuity due.
As the collectability is probable, you need to find the present value of this lease:
= 40,800 * Present value of annuity due factor, 5 year, 8%
= 40,800 * 4.3121
= $175,933.68
= $175,934
Answer:
The restaurants have a unique ambience, known in legal terms as their
Trade dress
Explanation:
Trade dress protects all elements used to promote a specific service or product. Examples of trade dress include packaging and the atmosphere or décor within a place of business. The term "trade dress" comes from a 1992 court ruling and refers to the way a product is "dressed" to go to market.