A wide agreement exists on the side of such factors as nourishment generation, movement, iron innovation, exchange, condition, or biology as assuming solid jobs in the procedures of state arrangement. Nigeria is a making of the frontier rule, this course deliberately investigates pre-provincial Nigeria.
<u>Explanation:</u>
State arrangement is the procedure of the advancement of an incorporated government structure in a circumstance where one didn't exist before its improvement. States were first made a large number of years back, essentially to battle wars and safeguard an area.
Today, states accomplish more than this. They give a type of focal control for open administrations and take care of the welfare of their residents. Nigeria authoritatively the Federal Republic of Nigeria, is a nation in West Africa, circumscribing Niger in the north, Chad in the upper east, Cameroon in the east, and Benin in the west. Its coast in the south is situated on the Gulf of Guinea in the Atlantic Ocean.
There are four hypotheses on the origins of the state and they are:
-
Force Theory
- Evolutionary Theory
- Divine Right Theory
- Social Contract Theory
Answer:
<u>Because even if the Absolutism has similarities and was applied in almost the entire Europe, each country modeled its conceptions to adapt to reality. </u>And this reality could be <u>social, political or religious.</u>
Explanation:
I believe that the better way to understand this point is analyzing the two major countries where the Absolutism was strong: France and England.
- France was ruled by Louis XIV in the 17th century. He describes himself as "The state is me" (“L'Etat c'est Moi”). This monarch is the main definition of the absolutist ruler. <u>To support his government, Louis XIV follows the idea of Divine Right of Kings which argued that the monarch had divine powers and was elected by God. Thus, his actions and laws were divine and couldn't be disrespected. </u>The question is: why this conception worked in France? <u>Because it was a catholic country, and religious perceptions were followed without question. Plus, Louis XIV had no limits in his powers. I mean, there was no law or political scheme that could limit him.</u>
- On the contrary, in England, <u>the king was subjected to the Parlament. </u>However, only this restriction was not sufficed to limit his power. The main point is that the British kings <u>followed the idea of a social contract (popularized by the philosopher Thomas Hobbes). </u>This idea attests that <u>a king has duties with its people,</u> and the Parlament was always remembering him about this. So, he couldn't do whatever he wanted.
<span>Albany Plan. The Albany Plan of Union was a plan to create a unified government for the Thirteen Colonies, suggested by Benjamin Franklin, then a senior leader (age 45) and a delegate from Pennsylvania, at the Albany Congress on July 10, 1754 in Albany, New York.</span>
There are lots of reason but, for instance modesty is believed to be very important which impacts how they dress cuz they dress in long loose clothing
