answer:Ethiopia achieved international prestige with its uniquely successful military resistance during the late 19th-century Scramble for Africa, becoming the only African country to defeat a European colonial power and retain its sovereignty.
<span>The answer is Letter D. It is written in a tone that is appropriate for an explanatory essay than the other letters. Since the letters a,b,c, is informal for an explanatory essay. Letter D. explains the Neolithic Revolution with formality and proper use of words, than the other letters.</span>
Fundamental reason for this was Russia’s under-developed economy, which was mostly agricultural – in fact until the mid-1800s it was almost entirely agrarian, with only minimal manufacturing or industry. <span> Government incentives of the late 1800s instigated a sharp increase in industrial investment and manufacturing; French investors, attracted by government deals, cheap labour and tax breaks, had eagerly pumped money into Russia to construct factories and new mines. But even with this, Russia still tailed its western European neighbours by a long stretch.</span>
The communal system that John Smith abolished at Jamestown that saved him from destruction is common-store system.
The common-store system was a system where each person was required to place the food of his labor in a common storehouse.
In the common-store system, the food taken by the community was then distributed equally. This was bad for the colonists as many of the people decided not to work since they knew they will still get the proceeds from the labor of other people. This led to food shortages. The system was eventually stopped by John Smith.
In conclusion, the correct option is the common-store system.
Read related link on:
brainly.com/question/25126662
Answer:
It is too far to read, please upload and I will answer :)
Explanation:
Aurangzeb did not respect his father and also throwed him to prison. Akbar was the third successor of the Bhabur the founder of the Mughal dynasty. Aurangzeb was the great grand son of Akbar and son of Shah jahan. Akabar did respected his parents and his Dynast and promoted the growth of his Dydnasty. He was one of the main reason why Mughal empire lost it’s power. Thus aurangzeb is totaly different from akbar. Mughal rulers', Akbar and Aurangzeb, policies were motivated by religious fluidity by Akbar who created a diverse, accepting, and highly successful empire while Aurangzeb's religious rigidity was the downfall of the Mughals. Akbar was very against having one religion in charge, eliminated the Jizya, made Persian the official language, established the Ibadat Khana and the Divine Faith in Fatehpur, combined religions. Aurangzeb returned to religious orthodoxy and reestablished the Jizya, resulted in revolts of sikhs and hindus and ultimately led to the downfall of the empire.
