1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
DerKrebs [107]
2 years ago
9

How do the revolutionary ideas of the French/Haitian Revolution Scientific Revolution and the Enlightenment go against the polit

ical ideas of Absolute
History
1 answer:
babymother [125]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Ultimately, the Enlightenment inspired a successful slave revolt in Haiti. While traditional scholarship has depicted the slaves in the revolt as brutes blindly following their cynical leader, in fact L'Ouverture actively used the ideas of European philosophy, which empowered them to become agents.

Explanation:

Hope it helps :)

You might be interested in
Justinian and Theodora helped the Byzantine Empire rise in power by:
boyakko [2]

Answer:

Correct answer is C. capturing territory in western Europe.

Explanation:

Option A is not correct as the church were divided in 1054 and never again were reunited.

B is not correct as Diocletian ruled between 3rd and 4th Century and Justinian ruled with Theodora in 6th Century.

C is correct as they managed to destroy Kingdom of Vandals in Northern Africa and Kingdom of Ostrogoths in Italy.

D is not correct as this was done in 11th Century by Emperor Alexius Comnenus.

8 0
3 years ago
College-level courses offered by high schools in partnership with local<br> colleges are called:
Mrrafil [7]

Answer:

AP classes

Explanation:

Advanced Placement

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Compare and contrast the author’s depictions of Nicholas II and Vladimir Lenin. What do these depictions reveal about these hist
Vinvika [58]

Answer: The comparison of Nicholas II and Vladimir Lenin

Explanation Both the leaders were hungry for power and came onto to become leaders by promising good for the people but the similarity didn't catch one's eye but how different to each historical figure was has been highlighted many a time.

  • Nicholas II was czar and hence being born into a royal family made him an obvious leader whereas Lenin gained prominence in the party and came into power thus.
  • Lenin had the willingness to lead Russia used the Bolshevik party to do so, however the Tsar was happy to be with his family and pets and not a bit interested in leadership.
  • Nicholas II and his entire family were assassinated whereas Lenin died of natural causes way later.
  • Lenin was the more brutal of the two and used his power to get what he wanted even if it meant  torturing or murdering. here Nicholas made some concessions.
  • The military responsibility was on Nicholas II during his regime but when Lenin took over he would delegate it.

Finally, none of them actually cared for the poor, the oppressed were further in distress when these two came to power.                  

4 0
3 years ago
What is the main difference between the roles of state and federal judges and other elected officials?
jonny [76]

The answer is C

C. Judges cannot be removed from office; elected officials can be removed from office.

The judges have more independence and autonomy in their work, so much so they cannot be removed from office at least they go against the constitution, on the contrary, elected officials can be removed, investigated or penalized from office by the attorney general's office if they commit grave offenses.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Letter from Birmingham Jail Assignment
solniwko [45]

Answer:

Considering the context of its creation, the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” is remarkably restrained in tone. Throughout his career, many critics of Dr. King argued that he was too deferential to the white authorities that facilitated segregation and other racist policies, but the tone here seems to serve several purposes. First, it conforms to his ultimate purpose of justifying his cause as being in the name of justice. He does not wish to validate his audience’s deep-seeded fears - that the black movement is an extremist set that will engender violence. Therefore, by utilizing restraint, he earns a sympathetic ear to which he then declares his proud embrace of extremism and tension. His difficult arguments end up practically unimpeachable precisely because he has presented them through logos as well as through pathos. However, the restraint also allows him to reinforce one of the letter’s central themes, the interconnectedness of man. There are times when he distinguishes himself and his cause from that of his opponents, particularly in terms of race. However, he for the most part suggests that all men are responsible for all others, an idea that would not be as effective if the tone of the argument was too fiery and confrontational.

Explanation:

Considering it was written in a situation so infused with racial issues, the “Letter from Birmingham Jail” is often strangely divorced from explicitly racial issues. Obviously, Dr. King cannot avoid the topic, but much of his argument, especially in the letter’s first half, is presented in universalist terms and through abstractions like “justice” and the interrelatedness of man. He argues that the clergymen, and his larger audience, should support his cause not because the victims are black but because it is the right thing to do. However, this passionate but restrained argument ultimately sets the stage for a declaration of what scholar Jonathan Rieder calls “a proclamation of black self-sufficiency” (94). Once he establishes the definitions of justice and morality, Dr. King argues that the black man will succeed with or without the help of white moderates because they operate with the just ideals of both secular America and divine guidance. Further, he implicitly suggests that by continuing to facilitate the oppression of the black man through moderation, his audience is operating in sin and will ultimately be on the losing side.

In Dr. King’s argument, moderation is a reflection of the moderate’s ignorant and unwitting sinfulness. In terms of the former, the white moderate operates under an illusion that patience will be more effective towards ending segregation than tension will be. Through a variety of legally-structured arguments, Dr. King illustrates the fallacy of both these assumptions. He argues that moderation is but a handy disguise for cowards who fear upsetting the status quo more than desire to pursue justice. However, because he stipulates that his audience is ostensibly interested in the virtue of justice, he argues that moderation allows them license to live in a sinfulness of inaction. To view the suffering of others but to remain silent facilitates a world where men are “separate,” which he equates with sinfulness. Through a variety of unambiguous comparisons – the just crusader to Jesus, and the moderates to those who did not protect the Jews of Nazi Germany – Dr. King decries moderation as the largest obstacle towards equal rights in America at the time.

One recurring idea that supports Dr. King’s arguments is that group mentality supports and enables immorality, and that the individual must therefore act for justice even when the group does not share that goal. He makes this point explicitly in the early part of the “Letter.” This argument supports his defense of civil disobedience, allows him to criticize the church for supporting the status quo rather than empowering crusaders for change, and supports the idea that law must reflect morality since it might otherwise be designed solely for the comfort of the majority. Overall, the discussion of group immorality supports his purpose of encouraging individual action in the face of injustice, and criticizing those who do not support such individual action for fear of upsetting the status quo.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In 1573 and 1574 king phillip ii issued 3 sets of laws to end the abuses of the conquistadors and adelantados system in new spai
    9·1 answer
  • Why was the temple built on mount Moriah
    6·1 answer
  • Détente means a) increased openness. B) restructuring. C) reform. D) a relaxing of tensions.
    14·2 answers
  • Fifteen-minute family dramas called soap operas aired on weekdays on the radio in the 1930s. Why were these dramas called soap o
    10·1 answer
  • What did the study in a Pennsylvania forest reveal about the environmental effects of using DDT? a. DDT caused the birds in the
    11·2 answers
  • Can Someone Please Help Me Fill This In?? <br> 78 points!!!!
    5·1 answer
  • To which cultural group did the Jumanos and Tiguas belong? a. Gulf b. Plains c. Pueblo d. Southeastern
    14·1 answer
  • How did George Washington, as president, increase the federal government's
    9·1 answer
  • County governments do not have a single individual that is completely in charge of government.
    5·2 answers
  • They are visiting phokhara simple past​
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!