Answer:
The reasonable prediction for successful rolls is 4.
Step-by-step explanation:
Assuming the rolling cube is a fair 6 sided cube, so the probability of success of one roll is given as
The total success is given as
For 24 rolls it is given as
So the reasonable prediction for successful rolls is 4.
D at least 1722.08 because you multiply 22042 by 42 then you divide by 100 and add 1375 to get d at least $1375.
I Hope This Helped!!
Answer:
The equation: 2 + 1.75m < 35
Solution: m < 10
Shannon can travel 10 miles or less
Step-by-step explanation:
You add the initial $2 fee plus $1.75 per mile. Since she wants to pay less than 35, the inequality is 2 + 1.75m < 35.
Write <u>two functions</u> that <u>describes</u> the <u>decrease of the population</u> after <u>t years.</u>
1. In one study, a population of 784 orangutans is expected to decrease at a rate of 25 orangutans per year. Then after t years the number of orngutans will be
2. In a second study, the population of a group of 817 orangutans is expected to decrease at a rate of 36 per year. Then after t years the number of orngutans will be
3. Equate right sides of the equations:
Answer: after 3 years
Based on the data, the most likely correlation coefficient would be -1.
The slope between 20 and 30 days is -1, and it represents the change in the surface area of the lake per day.
The data represents correlation, not causation.
Since the data would form a perfectly straight line through the points, the correlation coefficient would be -1 for a perfect decreasing fit.
To find the slope, find the change in the surface area between those days, the change in the days, and write it as surface area/days: 80-90=-10; 30-20=10; -10/10=-1
This is not causation because there could be lurking variables we cannot see.
