Answer:
History.com Editors
In the summer and fall of 1940, German and British air forces clashed in the skies over the United Kingdom, locked in the largest sustained bombing campaign to that date. A significant turning point of World War II, the Battle of Britain ended when Germany’s Luftwaffe failed to gain air superiority over the Royal Air Force despite months of targeting Britain’s air bases, military posts and, ultimately, its civilian population. Britain’s decisive victory saved the country from a ground invasion and possible occupation by German forces while proving that air power alone could be used to win a major battle.
On June 17, 1940, the defeated French signed an armistice and quit World War II. Britain now stood alone against the power of Germany’s military forces, which had conquered most of Western Europe in less than two months. But Prime Minister Winston Churchill rallied his stubborn people and outmaneuvered those politicians who wanted to negotiate with Adolf Hitler. But Britain’s success in continuing the war would very much depend on the RAF Fighter Command’s ability to thwart the Luftwaffe’s efforts to gain air superiority. This then would be the first all-air battle in history.
Explanation:
The PLUNDER collected from conquered territories was often divided among the soldiers
Or may commonly known as the spoil of war, plunder is the goods that can be stolen after an army defeated a territory, can be in the form of Gold, Land, foods, etc
If this is the passage that accompanies this question:
<span>"In this manner, the sage governs people: Emptying their minds, Filling their bellies, Weakening their ambitions, And strengthening their bongs. If people lack knowledge and desire Then they cannot act; If no action is taken Harmony remains"
</span>
Then, the quality desired in the above passage is weakness. The sage wanted to govern weak people, whom they can order around at will with fear of repercussions.
The last bubble is being cut off the screen, I don't know what the last option is.
Question 1
European imperialism in China would be very beneficial to the european nation and china. For example, the chinese government is very weak and could use a strong more firm government. If we can get china to agree in more trading laws for us then we can import our goods into china. Also this would be beneficial for us too because of the abundant resources that china possesses. Imperializing china can help improve their economy more. All these and more are the reasons that I support imperialism in china.
Question 2
If we imperialize china,that would be very selfish and greedy of us. China wants nothing to do with us or with what we have to offer and/or trade. Did we not learn a lesson when McCortteney went to china to try and negotiate. He was sent back empty handed!! Forcing china to try and abide by our rules will most likely turn into a war between us and them. I say that we just stick to the money, trades, and resources that we already have and leave china alone.
