In the context of electronic communication, <u>passive incivility</u> involves indirect form of disrespect.
Passive incivility involves indirect forms of disrespect through the context of electronic communication which are not replying to emails, using emails for time-sensitive messages, not acknowledging receipt of emails.
Passive incivility has its own impact in an individuals life. As this incivility is indirect there is not much behavior noticed. Thus, here the factor of ignorance plays an important role. For instance, when a person sends a disrespectful email, and so here it is hard to understand tone via email and you can’t see the person's body language.
Hence, passive incivility involves indirect form of disrespect.
To learn more about incivility here:
brainly.com/question/13939392
#SPJ4
Answer: Option B
Explanation: Opportunity cost refers to the of loss of profit when an individual or firm chooses one alternative over other.
The statement in the given case, depicts the opportunity cost one has to pay of using the scarce resources that could be sued on different alternatives.
The lunch is never free depicts that one could have used it in other alternatives that may have produced some economic benefits.
Hence, the correct option is B.
Yes, basically I have no Idea what you talking about. I heard that if you answer questions you can ask more. thanks.
Answer:
assets reduced by $59,000
Explanation:
To solve the problem we use the accounting formula.
Asset= Total liabilities + owner's equity
Since we are dealing with change in asset, liability, and equity
Change in asset = change in liability + change in owner's equity
Change in asset= -69,000 + 10,000
Change in asset= - 59,000
This implies that the company's assets reduced by $59,000
Answer:
Punnet square for hetero v homo (38 1/4) (38 1/4) and (76 1/4+1/4= 76 1/2)
: 38,38,76
Explanation:
The punnet square is commonly used to estimate the genotypes of a given breeding analysis. It is widely used to determine the probability or chances of an offspring have a specific genotype. It is commonly used by biologists for the calculation of the probability of offspring. Based on the available information, the answer is 38, 38, 76.