It's the second one; production of consumer goods increased.
<span>There's not really any pros for propaganda because essentially what you are doing is lying to get someone to believe something. I guess you could say a pro is that gullible people will believe you, but that's an unethical pro. The cons are that it usually causes much controversy in a society where there's not supposed to be a bias in the government. Propaganda in its true form is never a good thing. It is unethical in the sense that it takes advantage of people who are too lazy to do research and quick to believe what someone tells them. One example I like to use is many of these independent "news" websites. On both ends of the political spectrum, left and right, you find websites that have articles so heavily weighed down with that wings propaganda that true news becomes less and less visible. Occupy Democrats is one textbook example of that. Their articles are so left leaning that you read an article and are immediately left with a left leaning impression. Same goes for a lot of right wing websites. I'm not going to say "always" but propaganda 99.9 percent of the time is not good. Instead of people doing their own research to decide their view on something, propaganda </span>tells<span> people what they should think versus the </span><span>asking </span><span>people what they think</span>
Avalanches are close from little to none in occurrence in the south-east Asian Nations since most of the places located there don't have the season of winter or phenomenons that might result to snowing. Tornadoes are also close from little to none since these don't usually spawn in the lands of the south-east Asian nations. Drought would be a plausible answer to this question, but the occurrences if it happening were only second to typhoons. Typhoons, on the other hand, occur every year and sometimes occurs almost throughout a year. This is due to the nations of the south-east Asia being located near the Pacific and lies under the Typhoon Belt.
The scenario is an example of process loss
it is often conceptualised as the loss of effort that could have contributed to optimum benefits when a group is tasked to undertake a particular task. In the scenario, the non-contribution of Adam leads to a loss of benefit that would other wise have accrued from adam's persuasion power.
Answer:
They are afraid they are in danger from the bear.
