Answer:
The correct answer is:
Post hoc fallacy.
Explanation:
The post hoc fallacy is an argument based in the fact that an event happens just after the other, in this case it does not mean that just because the historian predicted the fact the result is a consequence of what he said, or that what he said was true. In this order, the fallacy uses the temporal consequence as an argument. Nevertheless, it is important to consider that temporal sequence is naturally part of the causality process.
Answer:
theology and history
Explanation:
The study of religion has long be done though anthropological views which formed the major thoughts in the development of the field of religious studies. The anthropology of religion, in most situations, have concentrated on social elements that are always identified as religious, beliefs about heavenly beings and God himself.
Throughout the history of mankind, the study of anthropology has shown our ever developing relationships with other individuals and culture. Anthropologists also examine the features of past and present communities of human beings via different techniques and systems.
Roberto will use rational choice theory to make the decision.
<u>Explanation:</u>
The act or process of understanding and modelling the economic and social behavior is known as the rational action theory or the rational choice theory. The theory generally predicts the pattern of choices and its outcome.
Here in the given excerpt, Roberto moved in to a new city and he wanted to find a mosque in order to practice Islam. From this we can infer that he chose to practice a religion and therefore he wanted to find worshiping place to practice (here he shows the understanding of the social behavior).
Therefore, we can conclude that Roberto exhibited the theory of rational choice to make a decision.
Answer:
you can try looking at the comandemnts
Explanation:
Everyone votes on everything
