The ironic law of oligarchy was introduced by <em>Robert Michels</em> and introduced to be<em> </em><em>applicable to all the groups of polity.</em>
Answer: Option B
<u>Explanation:</u>
The ironic law of oligarchy represented the theme, of oligarchy postulating through the thought that the <em>political growth in the organization</em> can be achieved through generation of hierarchy.
The hierarchy is believed to <em>achieve the growth by its own</em> and maintaining its very own elite class of leadership. The theory thus formed was not scientifically tested, or argued upon mining metals, nor was this applicable to capitalists only.
Answer:
Protection of minority rights
Explanation:
It's more in line with the freedom of religion though.
The Radical Republicans opposed Lincoln's plan, as they thought it too lenient toward the South.
Answer: second amendment
Explanation:
Second Amendment - Right to Bear Arms | The National Constitution Center
In the Sykes-Picot agreement, concluded on May 19, 1916, France and Britain divided up the Arab territories of the former Ottoman Empire into spheres of influence. In its designated sphere, it was agreed, each country shall be allowed to establish such direct or indirect administration or control as they desire and as they may think fit to arrange with the Arab State or Confederation of Arab States. Under Sykes-Picot, the Syrian coast and much of modern-day Lebanon went to France; Britain would take direct control over central and southern Mesopotamia, around the Baghdad and Basra provinces. Palestine would have an international administration, as other Christian powers, namely Russia, held an interest in this region. The rest of the territory in question a huge area including modern-day Syria, Mosul in northern Iraq, and Jordan would have local Arab chiefs under French supervision in the north and British in the south. Also, Britain and France would retain free passage and trade in the other’s zone of influence.