The problem with this sentence is that there is no subject-verb agreement.
<h3>What is subject-verb agreement?</h3>
The subject-verb agreement implies the verb should agree with the subject on the number (singular vs plural). Here are some examples.
- The girls are brave (both the subject and theverb are plural).
- The girl is brave (both the subject and the verb are singular).
<h3>What is the problem in the sentence presented?</h3>
The sentence about whales does not show the subject-verb agreement. This is because in the section there is approximately 2,200 blue whales the author is using a singular verb is to refer to a plural subject 2,200 blue whales.
Note: This question is incomplete; here is the complete question:
What's wrong with this sentence: "Today there is approximately 2,200 blue whales in the eastern North Pacific and research indicates that the population hasn't changed significantly since 1993"
Learn more about plural in: brainly.com/question/4417996
Answer:
Pramila is playing <u>quietly.</u>
Han speaks very <u>loudly.</u>
Mukesh is a <u>careful </u>driver.
The test was <u>easy</u> and we finished in time.
He is fitting the <u>automatic</u> door in my house.
My uncle speaks <u>perfect</u> Chinese.
It was raining very <u>heavily</u>.
She looked very<u> calm</u>, but I am sure she was feeling very nervous.
Answer:
(This is the exact sample answer so you might want to paraphrase)
The video helped strengthen my knowledge of the Civil War. I knew that the war started because of differences between the North and the South, but now I know the war had many causes, including slavery and states’ rights.
Explanation:
Hope this helps! :-)
B) It is unnecessary to oversee the athletes involved in mixed martial arts.
The viewpoint made in section one is that "State athletic commissions should strictly monitor and regulate the UFC." A rebuttal statement is one that goes against the viewpoint, so it needs to say something about how the UFC should not be monitored or regulated. Option A agrees with the viewpoint by saying overseeing athletes is necessary. Option B states the opposite by saying it is unnecessary to oversee athletes. Therefore, this is the correct answer. Option C says that athletes must self-regulate. While this puts the responsibility of regulating on the athletes, it does not take it away from the commissions. There is nothing here to suggest that the commissions would not regulate just because the athletes are. Option D has nothing to do with monitoring or regulating so it is a poor choice.