Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, it is a felony for an auditor to willfully fail to maintain proper records of audits and work papers for at least five years.
Option d
<u>Explanation:
</u>
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002 is a federal act providing rigorous auditing of government corporations ' banking regulations. Legislators also produced legislation to ensure safety for investors, employees and the community from accounting irregularities and dishonest financial practices.
Sarbanes-Oxley offers for a new act entitled "Corporate and Criminal Fraud Accountability Act 2002" (CCFA Act), which promises to change federal criminal law to the following:
-
Prohibit anyone from intentionally changing, damage, mutilation, and covering, cover-up, falsifying or accessing any documents in a matter that is within the competence of any government agency or any federal bankrupt case, obstructing or affecting an inquiry.
- Forbid an auditor from intentionally or inadvertently not holding any inspection or examination papers relating to a government undertaking over a five-year period although it's not a felony for Sarbanes-Oxley to hold these working papers for at least 5 years, over seven years, the auditors must retain their records.
Currently available genetic test panels have no proven value for choosing antidepressant treatment, and their use risks providing inappropriate care. So, while gene testing can be very useful for some other conditions, notably some cancer treatments, that success does not yet apply in treating depression.
Answer:
no
Explanation:
this will help the criminals to be alert of officers
Answer:
O a passenger assisting a driver.
Explanation:
Having a designated texter when driving is an example of a passenger assisting a driver when an urgent text or message comes up and is needed to be answered immediately.
Hope this helps!
Answer:
Under both statutes.
Explanation:
The meeting shown in the question above managed to violate two statutes, according to the statute developed to combat organized crime, in addition to violating the study that prohibits interstate drug transport. In that case, the convict must be tried for two infractions in different statutes and if convicted he must be convicted based on the guidelines of the two statutes.
