If Pamela appeals the case in order to include the witness who saw Darin driving, it is possible that the appeals court will not take the witness's testimony into account.
<h3>What happens if Pamela appeals?</h3>
Appeals courts are not there to retry a case or to give the case a new trial. Their purpose is to check if there were errors in the way the lower court handled the case.
This means that they often do not take new witness testimony into account. What this means for Pamela is that even though she has a new witness, the appeals court might not consider the testimony of the witness because they were not used in the first court.
Find out more on the appeals process at brainly.com/question/1897528
#SPJ1
The answer to your question is A, it is a because the Congress has the power to make any laws they want. Therefore the Supreme Court has the power to decide if the laws the congress made are unconstitutional.
Answer:
I ensure everyone has an equal and adequate amount of time to represent themselves and then I would evaluate them based on company values and leadership skills then I would make my final decision.
Explanation:
Answer:
It was weakened and could not provide military protection.
Explanation:
Tax exemption is the exemption from tribute by law, performed by the federal entity competent to institute it. There is no realization of the tax entry, although the chargeable event occurs and consequently the tax obligation is established. Tax exemption can be a way of encouraging private investment in the development of areas of public interest.
During Japan's recovery, the existence of a tax exemption for land reclamation greatly weakened the country's central government as taxation was reduced, causing a major embezzlement in the public coffers. As a result, the government could not maintain effective military protection as it had no resources to maintain the army.
