Hello there!
The answer to this question will be answer choice A.
When using the SAS postulate, we need two pairs of sides and the pair of the angles between those two sides to be congruent.
It is given that one pair of sides are congruent, along with a pair of congruent angles.
We want the congruent angle to be between two congruent sides, thus AC must be congruent to EC in order for these triangles to be proven congruent by the SAS postulate.
Hope this helps and have an awesome day! :)
Answer:
nonlinear
Step-by-step explanation:
The degree of x in the equation is not 0 or 1, so the function is nonlinear.
_____
<em>Additional comment</em>
Your function graphs as a parabola, not a straight line. A function is only linear if its graph is a straight (non-vertical) line.
9 because it’s skip counting by 3 and 2
Answer:
1/36
Step-by-step explanation:
When the coefficient is 1, the function has zeros at -3 and -5, one horizontal unit from the vertex. You want to move the zero to (2, 0), which is 6 units from the vertex. To achieve a horizontal stretch by a factor of 6, the value of x in the function must be replaced by x/6. That would make the coefficient of x^2 be (1/6)^2 = 1/36.
The coefficient of the squared term is 1/36.