1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Bogdan [553]
2 years ago
15

Why was the role of women equal to men in the haudenosaunee group?

History
1 answer:
xenn [34]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The women were equal to men in the Haudenosaunee group because they were a matriarchy. That means a social organization where every or most of the powers derive from women and/or femininity.

Explanation:

In the Haudenosaunee matriarchy, families followed a matrilineal system: children and property passed on according to their mothers, not fathers. When a couple married, the man came to live in the woman's family house, not the other way around.

It was a clan of mothers that appointed leaders and could discard leaders. Women had rights to their property and the products of their work.

You might be interested in
What is the Great Karoo?​
AleksAgata [21]

Answer:

The southernmost tip of Africa

Explanation:

The Karoo is a semi desert natural region of South Africa. No exact definition of what constitutes the Karoo is available, so its extent is also not precisely defined

8 0
3 years ago
American ships became targets of attack by 1917 because
sashaice [31]

American ships became targets of attack by 1917 because Americans continued to trade with the warring nations.

At that time, the american vowed that we adopt a non-interventionist policy during the war time. But when we continue to trade with warring nations, other nations viewed it as we supplying materials and supplies to one of the nations that involved in the war. This is why american ships became targets of attack.

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is a crusade?
ddd [48]
Answer is A. A journey to the Holy Land
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In debating the origins of knowledge, Plato and Aristotle disagreed about the relative importance of what?
Andreyy89

Plato and Aristotle disagreed about the relative importance of Nature and Nurture.

<em>Plato</em> introduced the term nativism (<em>Nature</em>) as the idea that our thoughts, ideas and characteristics are inborn. In other words, we are believed to be born with these thoughts, ideas and characteristics, and that they are already in our genes.

On other hand, Aristotle introduced the idea to us of empiricism, or <em>Nurture</em>. He described this as, knowledge is gained through experience (senses). Our thoughts and ways are not because of our genetic make-up, but because of how we were raised and brought up by our parents and overall lifestyle.  

8 0
3 years ago
According to Erik Erikson's theory of psychosocial development, what must occur at each stage of development to move successfull
shusha [124]

Answer:

An emotional crisis must be resolved

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why is america labeled the last refuge of democracy
    9·2 answers
  • Hurston’s years in Eatonville were _______________________. a. free of racial discrimination c. not influential in her future wr
    14·1 answer
  • The Ten Commandments and five pillars of wisdom are similar in that they
    9·1 answer
  • Have the olmypics been canceled?
    15·1 answer
  • How was the Industrial Revolution sparked?​
    13·1 answer
  • What were the bases for many of the early 1800s reform movements? A. religion and optimism B. politics and pessimism C. culture
    15·2 answers
  • Which of the following BEST describes the main difference between scarcity and a shortage? A. While a shortage is a temporary ma
    12·2 answers
  • Edge 2020
    12·2 answers
  • Evaluate each statement and select the one that is most accurate:
    5·1 answer
  • What level of government does the Bill of Rights apply to?
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!