<u>Answer:
</u>
In the given case, I would assign members to the team who come from a similar culture.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- In order to ensure the success of an important task that has to be inevitably carried out by a team, it would be necessary to constitute the team by including only the individuals that bear an utter sense of cooperation and understand how important it is to accomplish the task within the stipulated time.
- To constitute such a team, it would require an intelligent coordinator who is aware of the behavioral traits and attributes of the employees working under him.
Could you tell me what predicate is? I can help you if I know that.
All of the above
Useless information from last year now actually being useful:)
Answer:
B). Its results are not generally applicable.
Explanation:
A case study is described as the research plan or an experimental investigation that primarily intends to observe or examine a phenomenon, individual, or a group(as representatives) within its authentic context to make generalized deductions or conclusions.
As per the question, option B best describes the outcomes of a case study. The description of 'its results are not generally applicable' reflects that the research could not lead to producing a generalized conclusion that can represent the other associated units intensively. Thus, <u>option B</u> is the correct answer.
Members <span>of the command staff are referred to as, officers.
HOPE THIS HELPS! ^_^</span>
