1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Wewaii [24]
3 years ago
13

Why planets are more complex than stars?

History
1 answer:
muminat3 years ago
4 0
Both of them are complex, they're still just big balls of hydrogen with a few other elements thrown in. Planets are far more complex in terms of composition, even the gaseous ones. They may rival the stars for dynamic complexity, we don't really know enough about either yet to be sure. Rocky planets like Earth are relatively static by comparison, but far more varied in composition than gas giant planets or stars.
You might be interested in
What message is the cartoonist trying to convey concerning HUAC?*
iren2701 [21]

Answer:

B

Explanation:

HUAC acted recklessly in attempting to find communist influence in the USA

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
We celebrate the 4th of july because thats when the _____ was signed
otez555 [7]
Declaration of Independence
7 0
3 years ago
Under the provisions in the magna carta , people who were accused of an offense had the right to trial by a jury of ?
USPshnik [31]
<span>Judgment of their peers "language, which associate with the jury trial right, did not guarantee trial by jury." Links between Magna Carta and jurys did guarentee that were actually forged centuries later after the original document.

I hope this helps!</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Why should historians avoid oversimplifications when analyzing sources?
Mekhanik [1.2K]

Answer:

The correct answer is <u><em>B) Oversimplifications often ignore complex or contradictory  evidence</em></u>

Explanation:

History is not always easy to study and the further we go back, the further we have to rely on second hand or third hand sources.

For example, in order to study something that happened 20 years ago is fairly easy since it would be recorded either in newspapers, books, or even video.

However, it is not always easy to draw conclusions when we are studying an event that took place 2,000 years ago.

Most of them times we rely on information passed on from generations before until finally someone wrote it down.

While many historians get tempted to Over-simply an event to draw certain conclusions, this should not be practiced as it creates a bias and forces us to study or even research for contradictory evidence. Sometimes, this contradictory evidence can completely change our understanding of the event.

3 0
3 years ago
How old is the happy birthday constitution
spayn [35]
Older than me and obama combined
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was a result of the roman army building roads and bridges in places where they were fighting
    5·2 answers
  • Which statement best summarizes the process of the abolition of slavery in the United States?
    5·2 answers
  • Why was the Congress of Vienna considered a success?
    15·1 answer
  • What is 90 miles south of florida and has a communist government?
    5·1 answer
  • True or False? Buddhism began in China.
    7·2 answers
  • Why would you think equality is more important then consent of the government
    6·1 answer
  • What was the result of Republican anger st president Johnson over reconstruction
    8·2 answers
  • Chinese leaders have been able to do all of the following since the death of mao zedong except
    15·1 answer
  • Who is the current prime minister of greece?​
    8·2 answers
  • 8. A focus of British reform efforts in India was
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!