1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
qaws [65]
2 years ago
11

Should boys not help in the kitchen help me write for or agains the motion

English
1 answer:
SpyIntel [72]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

No they should, after all if they have mothers caring for them I say yes, we need to help her. But if it's every single day, no, you lazy a/ss bast/ard at least clean the dishes once.

Explanation:

It's kinda unfair if we have to wash dishes everyday for all 3 meals, if your mother tells you to do that, shes treating you unequally.

You might be interested in
H how many times does 20 to go into 198
ASHA 777 [7]
198 ÷ 20 = 9.9

Whenever a question asks how many times a number goes into a number, this means division.
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
He is well qualified, ………. he is still unemployed. (0.5 Points)
grin007 [14]

Answer:

However

Explanation:

Despite and in spite of is used when a subject is unaffected by something

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How were julius Caesars battles portrayed
kolezko [41]

Answer:When Caesar lost most of his fleet, he returned to Gaul to regroup and resume his journey. He had ordered the people there to build him a large fleet. After defeating Cassibellaun, he returned to France.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
Simplicity is an example of a(n):
Furkat [3]

Simplicity is an example of an abstract noun. It is because an abstract noun is a word to describe something that a person can’t use any sensory functions in which simplicity is a way of having to describe someone without having to use any functions.

4 0
2 years ago
Quindlen begins by disagreeing with a fellow writer. How and how fairly does she represent the opposing point of view?
Oksi-84 [34.3K]

Answer:Quindlen was criticizing the application of standardized testing (perhaps in the wake of the controversial "No Child Left Behind" act which some say placed too much emphasis on standardized testing). Quindlen's argument is that if standardized testing is to be used, it should at least be interesting and more importantly, such testing should not edit works of literature to the point at which significant meaning is lost. Actually, she is arguing that literature should not be edited at all.  

Quindlen doesn't think children are too feeble and weak to read controversial issues because they are exposed to such issues through the media and Internet every day. In fact, by sanitizing (editing out anything remotely controversial) literature, the test will not challenge the student.  

Those who design the test claim that anything controversial might distract the student and affect his/her performance. Quindlen's response is that the kids can handle it and more to the point, if all remotely controversial issues are edited out, what is left can hardly been interesting or engaging. Also, to edit in this way is historically irresponsible. Quindlen notes that in Isaac Singer's excerpt about being a young Jew in prewar (World War II) Poland, all references to Jews and Poles were taken out.  

Quindlen notes that there are other consequences of this editing. One is that the students will determine from this that those designing the test have no faith in their (the students') ability to handle differing perspectives and challenging intellectual material. Quindlen argues that this is sending the message to children that "we don't think you're smart enough."  

But what do the kids learn from this? That the written word doesn't really matter much, that it can be weakened at will. That no one trusts a student to understand that variations in opinion and background are both objectively interesting and intellectually challenging.  

This also tells the student that there is no power to the written word (as literature, laws, etc.) if we can simply edit things that don't appeal to a particular way of thinking. So, clearly Quindlen is against this manipulation of literature, in these tests and in general, for a number of reasons, all logical. This kind of editing also sets a dangerous precedent where those in power of educating children have the ability to subject students to a particular worldview that they only assume is the best for everyone. This is quite audacious and ignores one of the hallmarks of American culture: diversity.

Explanation:

hope you get your thing correct

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • 0. John, a supervisor at the local factory, receives frequent requests from workers on how to fix the machine they use. What sho
    15·1 answer
  • It’s important to ___ some free time to volunteer work, if you would like to study in a Canadian
    5·2 answers
  • Intro to the Myers-Briggs Personality Test<br><br><br> Need all answers form the video please
    14·1 answer
  • Please answer all its only like 6 questions answer it like <br> 1:<br> 2:<br> 3:<br> 4:<br> 5:
    15·2 answers
  • What do the photographs tell the reader about how long ago Buster Keaton was making films? Explain your answer.
    10·2 answers
  • Should not wearing a seatbelt be illegal?please dont copy from a website.write 3 paragraph.Will brainlist
    12·1 answer
  • [Help?]
    10·1 answer
  • What is a good comentary 2 for the tell tale heart and why the narrator is insane, I have to get this right for class. UGHH
    15·1 answer
  • 100 points &amp; brainliest!! What is Transcendentalism?
    9·2 answers
  • Exercise 1 Draw one line under each compound subject and two lines under the simple predicate they share. Circle the conjunction
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!