Answer:
- 'The law is "narrowly tailored" to achieve the compelling purpose, and uses the "least restrictive means" to achieve the purpose.'
Explanation:
As per 'strict scrutiny analysis,' in order to illustrate that a specific government action is constitutionally accurate, the government requires to demonstrate that the law is closely adapted in order to attain the compelling purpose by employing 'fewer conditional sources' that helps in attaining the desired purpose. Basically, the government needs to prove that the action is necessary to achieve the goal.
Answer:
The government wanted to keep the number of free and slave states equal so that neither of would throw off the balance of congress.
For example, if there was more slave states in congress, then most likely the laws would be made in favor of slavery.
It is Sucre. Hope this helps!
