Answer:
The war between the two-person was inevitable for several reasons.
Explanation:
In the Middle East, during 1952, there was turbulence among Arabs for a requirement of leadership. The gap filled by Gamal Abdel Nasser of Egypt. Over many years his ideas and evolutionary zeal have provoked French, British, and pro-Western monarchies.
With the death of Nasser in 1970, there was a sudden race for the leadership among the Middle Eastern leaders. Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini of Iran and President Saddam Hussein of Iraq were among them.
Saddam Hussein advocate progress under the secularism. He believes that a dictatorial government that force modernization is a shortcut to progress.
Ayatollah Khomeini believed that the Middle East controlled by foreign powers. His opinions and ideologies opposed to Saddam Hussein. Ayatollah urged the Shia of Iraq to overthrow his government.
Saddam Hussein invaded Iran in September 1980 where his attack led to forecast Iraq as the new leading power. Saddam led the war between Iraq and Iran for eight-year.
Two of the main <span>obstacles to democratic government in South America have been 1) widespread corruption in government, which suppresses free elections, and economic hardships, which often help the rise of dictators. </span>
The Great Inflation Of The 1970s<span>. It's the </span>1970s<span>, and the stock market is a mess. It loses 40% in an 18-month period, and for close to a decade few people want anything to do with stocks. </span>Economic<span> growth is weak, which results in rising unemployment that eventually reaches double-digits.
</span>
James Otis
The phrase had been used for more than a generation in Ireland. By 1765, the term was in use in Boston, and local politician James Otis was most famously associated with the phrase, "taxation without representation is tyranny."