Who represented the accused in the witchcraft trials

2 answers:

8 0

Answer: There were two primary accusations, one from Abigail Hobbs who during her own confession to witchcraft named Giles and Martha Corey as fellow witches, and one from Exekiell Chevers and John Putnam, Jr., who filed an accusation on behalf of Ann Putnam, Marcy Lewis, Abigail Williams, Mary Walcott and Elizabeth Hubbard.

hjlf2 years ago

8 0

Answer: None, they represented themselves.

Explanation: According to historyofmassachusetts.org, “During a formal trial, the accused were not represented by lawyers but were allowed to directly ask accusers and witnesses questions. This often did not work out in the accused person’s favor because they were often not educated enough or emotionally equipped enough to defend themselves against the accusation of witchcraft. In addition, the accused often faced overwhelming and easily faked evidence”…”Even if the accused did cross-examine the witness, there wasn’t much they could say to de-bunk these types of claims.” (Brooks, What Options Did an Accused Witch Have in Salem?)

You might be interested in

In a ____ system, one party rarely gets enough power to control the government.

algol13

Answer:

Multiparty system

Explanation:

3 0

2 years ago

What helped unify the Carolingian Empire?

Pepsi [2]

Answer:Education, work with Church and Spread of Christianity are what helped to unify the Carolingian Empire.

Explanation: Carolingian Empire can be described as an empire in western and central Europe in the middle ages.

Charlemagne was the first Frankish king who united most of the territories of Western and central Europe. He dashed or gave out money and land to the Christian church and protected the popes, He built a school in his palace and employed the best teachers to teach in the school.

4 0

2 years ago

Application 1.4: In your small group, practice changing criticisms to complaints. Think of destructive criticism, maybe that you

andrezito [222]

Destructive criticism is a kind of criticism usually made in order to harm someone. It is used normally as a factor of defamation. It is used to hamper some one' reputation

Explanation:

Criticism is a gate way which provides a reader with clarity of thoughts and sometimes criticism can be too harsh that it would ruin the derogate and destroy the self esteem of a person who faces the criticism. No boy likes to be criticized, this is the fact and hence it depends largely on a person on how to react to a destructive criticism.

Analyse the relevance the criticism and decide how to resolve it when you observe that the criticism is relevant. The critic must not be too harsh while criticizing. He must be professional and turn his criticism in to a complaint which would make both the critic and the criticized to focus on the problem and solve it.