<em>Answer:</em>
<em>b. Egocentrism </em>
<em>Explanation:</em>
<em><u>Egocentrism,</u></em><em> in psychology, is described as an individual's incapability of understanding that the other person's opinion or view might be distinct from that of his or her own. Egocentrism generally signifies a 'cognitive bias', in a way that a person feels or thinks that another person shares the similar perspective as he or she does, however, the person is not able to think that the person may hold a different perspective.</em>
<em><u>As per the question, the given statement is an example of egocentrism.</u></em>
This is an example of the <u>"negative" </u>kind of correlation.
A negative correlation implies that there is a reverse connection between two variables - when one variable reduces, the other increases. The other way around is a negative correlation as well, in which one variable increments and alternate declines. These connections are considered in measurements as a methods for deciding the connection between two factors.
Is there supposed to be options?
This is called the fallacy of positive instances.
The fallacy of positive instances is a biased and erroneous way of thinking, wherein we <span>tend to remember or notice information that seems to confirm our expectations and existing beliefs about unusual phenomena. This fallacy in thinking also involves disregarding discrepancies, rationality and logical reasoning when associating </span>unusual phenomena with our pre-existing beliefs. <span>
</span>
Answer:
D. is invalid because although on its face it's an intrastate law, this statute will have a significant economic effect on interstate commerce causing an undue burden
Explanation:
States can create laws that improve residents' lives by providing more security, education or infrastructure. Even if states have the autonomy to create their laws, some of them could not be sanctioned because they are the responsibility of the federal government and not the state. An example of this is the law made by the state of Kansas shown in the above question that, although it was created for a good reason (which was to promote road safety), it refers to an intrastate law that creates a significant burden on commerce between the state of Kansas and another state. This type of law can only be created by the federal government (specifically, the federal congress) to be valid.
