1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dennis_Churaev [7]
2 years ago
10

Do you think it's a good idea for the federal government to regulate the information that is shared over social media based on t

he impact it has on viewers? What might be some unintended consequences of federal regulation of social media content?
Law
2 answers:
scoray [572]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

yes because of freedom of speach

Explanation:

Basile [38]2 years ago
3 0
No it’s not a good idea because it violates the first amendment which is our freedom of speech. Federal regulation is ultimately an overuse of power, and the government shouldn’t have allowed social media if they were just going to restrict social media
You might be interested in
Why did congress fail to sign the bill in the first place?
miskamm [114]
The power of the President to refuse to approve a bill or joint resolution and thus prevent its enactment into law is the veto.
6 0
2 years ago
If trump goes out what does it mean for hilory clinton to be preisedent how is it diffrent
Nitella [24]

Answer:

absolutely nothing because they both suck

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why are some rights more important than other rights.
loris [4]

Answer:

Well gay  rights are not really awsome

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Baker and others entered a Wal-Mart store shortly after 3:00 A.M. by cutting through the metal door with an acetylene torch. Som
hodyreva [135]

Answer:

There are enough intent and action to commit a crime.  By burglarizing the store and moving some goods to the rear door, Baker and his co-travellers have established specific intent to commit larceny.

Specific intent requires planning before the time and the predisposition to commit the act.  They have even establish general intent by actually entering the store and cutting through the metal door with an acetylene torch.

Explanation:

Larceny is robbery.  The intent to commit a crime by Baker and his co-travellers is established by their actions at the crime scene.  They cannot be exonerated because they have not yet taken the goods away from the store.  But, it can be established that the intent exists merely by their presence at the crime scene at such an hour of the morning.

8 0
3 years ago
What is the first step when investigating an arson?
nadya68 [22]

Answer:

identify the plant - the material that used to set the fire

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • In your opinion, does the government work the way it should? Is power shared equally or does one branch control more than its sh
    5·1 answer
  • 4. A new agent capable of infecting mammals, birds, and certain insects has been found in approximately
    7·2 answers
  • Which of the following are types of public buildings used for polling places? Select all that apply.
    14·2 answers
  • Without paying interest for a late bill, if the $5,543 has to be paid in 12 payments over the next year, how much will they need
    8·1 answer
  • HELP PLZ ASAP!!!!
    14·1 answer
  • Why you do think it is important to have safety<br> procedures in the workplace?
    6·2 answers
  • The two main groupings of nations during World War II were the Allied Powers and the Axis Powers
    13·1 answer
  • What is the best definition of anthropometry?
    8·1 answer
  • Hello! ^v^ ❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
    9·2 answers
  • I WILL GIVE 50 POINTS! PLEASE HELP!!
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!