<u>Answer:</u>
<em>B. fighting to keep abortions legal
</em>
<u>Explanation:</u>
The result of Roe v. Wade was the right given to women to end their pregnancies. The state still had the right against abortions. The women’s rights group today supports the right for women to legally undergo abortions. The group demands equal rights for women, the same as those of men. This also views pregnancy and/ or abortion as an important right exercised by a woman. The state cannot assure the required facilities for pregnancy to women, hence, women should have the right to undergo abortion supported by the law.
Answer:
Amendments may be proposed either by the Congress, through a joint resolution passed by a two-thirds vote.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
The Roman Empire was so large that it covered Europe, North Africa, and parts of Asia. The large empire was hard to rule. What did the emperor do to solve this problem?
The Roman Emperor decided to split the empire into two large portions: the Western Roman Empire and the Eastern Roman Empire. The eastern Roman Empire ended up being the Byzantine Empire a survived approximately 1000 years after the fall of the Western Roman Empire.
The ruler that divided Rome in order to bring stability to the empire was Diocletian.
He split the Roman Empire in two, naming his son-in-law, ruler of the West. His name was Maximilian and later changed his mane to Marcus Aurelius Valerio.
The advantages in Shakespeare's images is that you get a glimpse of how Shakespeare, himself saw the world. This is helpful AND positive because you get a full understanding of Shakespeare's life and perspective.
Answer:Hope This Helps
Explanation:
On February 4, 1887, both the Senate and House passed the Interstate Commerce Act, which applied the Constitution’s “Commerce Clause”—granting Congress the power “to Regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States”—to regulating railroad rates. Small businesses and farmers were protesting that the railroads charged them higher rates than larger corporations, and that the railroads were also setting higher rates for short hauls than for long-distance hauls. Although the railroads claimed economic justification for policies that favored big businesses, small shippers insisted that the railroads were gouging them.
It took years for Congress to respond to these protests, due to members’ reluctance to have the government interfere in any way with corporate policies. In 1874 legislation was introduced calling for a federal railroad commission. The bill passed the House, but not the Senate. When Congress failed to act, some states adopted their own railroad regulations. Those laws were struck down in 1886, when the Supreme Court ruled in that the state of Illinois could not restrict the rates that the Wabash Railroad was charging because its freight traffic moved between the states, and only the federal government could regulate interstate commerce. Continued public anger over unfair railroad rates prompted Illinois senator Shelby M. Cullom to hold the hearings that led to the enactment of the Interstate Commerce Act.
That law limited railroads to rates that were “reasonable and just,” forbade rebates to high-volume users, and made it illegal to charge higher rates for shorter hauls. To hear evidence and render decisions on individual cases, the act created the Interstate Commerce Commission. This was the first federal independent regulatory commission, and it served as a model for others that would follow, from the Federal Trade Commission to the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Consumer Product Safety Commission.
Evolving technology eventually made the purpose of the ICC obsolete, and in 1995 Congress abolished the commission, transferring its remaining functions to the Surface Transportation Board. But while the ICC has come and gone, its creation marked a significant turning point in federal policy. Before 1887, Congress had applied the Commerce Clause only on a limited basis, usually to remove barriers that the states tried to impose on interstate trade. The Interstate Commerce Act showed that Congress could apply the Commerce Clause more expansively to national issues if they involved commerce across state lines. After 1887, the national economy grew much more integrated, making almost all commerce interstate and international. The nation rather than the Constitution had changed. That development turned the Commerce Clause into a powerful legislative tool for addressing national problems.
