Because you need to know what you are placing first and last and what is improtant and what is not.least important at the end...
Most commonly "C", because they would want the reader to understand that something is different. Yes, they can change the style whenever they want to, but it would be more meaningful if they did it for a reason.
The positive connotation for noisy it think would be "participative".
The definition, according to Merriam-Webster is as follows:
Definition of participative<span>. : relating to or involving participation; especially : of, relating to, or being a style of management in which subordinates participate in decision making.</span>
Answer:
1. Weeds are pulled up by the men in the plantation.
2. The shelf is tidied by one of the girls every afternoon.
3. Woods are chopped by my father for the umu.
4. A beautiful puletasi is worn by Silia to school.
5. Letters are written by the students to their pen friends.
Answer: D. to inform readers about Blair's apology
Explanation:
The article excerpt provides information about Blair's apology in an unbiased way, meaning that it doesn´t intend to convince the reader of whether an apology was in order or not.
Option A is incorrect because the idea that British diplomats had allegedly been working non-stop is how Blair, and not the article, intends to persuade people not to blame them. Option B is incorrect because the article doesn´t ask or even hint for people to help British survivors. Option C is incorrect because the article is not meant to explain why Britons were deserted, but to inform how Blair considers they were not deserted at all.
