Really confusing try summing it up in your own words for the answer!! Hope I helped!!
Through the analysis of Rodrigo Duterte's performance, we can say that he obtained very effective decisions, but that they were not enough to free him from controversial and completely ineffective attitudes.
We can arrive at this answer because:
- Rodrigo Duterte is the President of the Philippines.
- He became a very controversial president, despite having some efficient government attitudes.
- Rodrigo Duterte presented effective proposals to promote the strengthening of the lower social classes.
- It allowed poorer people to access higher education free of charge, as it promoted access to birth control pills to women who could not afford them.
- It also encouraged government transparency, as it allowed any citizen to have access to government data, particularly about public spending and politicians' behavior.
- He had a policy aimed at preserving the environment, fighting harmful activities that degrade nature.
Even with these positive points, the policy established by Rodrigo Duterte was very controversial. First, he launched a very aggressive attack on drug users and traffickers, completely disobeying human rights.
He also criticized world and religious leaders with obscene language, as well as promoting ineffective strategies against the coronavirus.
More information:
brainly.com/question/639865
The moral of Guy de Maupassant’s “The False Gems” (“Les Bijoux” in French, 1883) sharply questions the hypocrisy of its male protagonist, Monsieur Lantin. Lantin is passionately in love with his young wife, whom he sees as the embodiment of beauty and virtue. His wife is perfect in every aspect, except for her love of imitation jewelry and the theater. Being of a puritanical bent of mind, Lantin finds both of his wife’s interests showy and improper. Clearly, such interests do not fit his worldview of what a well-brought-up, modest woman should be enjoying. At one point he remonstrates her ostentatious tastes, saying:
My dear, as you cannot afford to buy real diamonds, you ought to appear adorned with your beauty and modesty alone, which are the rarest ornaments of your sex.
Clearly, it is not the fact that she wears jewelry which bothers Lantin, but the fact that these gems are false. Despite having such fixed notions about real and fake, truth and deception, Lantin is ironically oblivious to how his wife manages to eke out their lavish lifestyle on his modest salary of 3,500 francs. After his wife dies of a lung infection, Lantin is heartbroken. But soon the heartbreak is replaced by financial hardship: left to manage his income by himself, Lantin struggles for even his next meal. Here, he commits his first act of impropriety, attempting to sell off his beloved wife’s imitation jewelry. Thus, the text begins to reveal his hypocrisy.
When a jeweler’s appraisal shockingly reveals that the ornaments are not fake at all, but real and precious, Lantin’s hypocrisy sparkles as well. At first, he falls into a “dead faint” at the implication of the jewelry's actual worth. His modest, virtuous wife was clearly leading a double life, being gifted gems from her many admirers. It was this double life that funded the extravagant lifestyle of the Lantins.
But Lantin’s state of shock at his wife’s “betrayal” does not last long and gives way to something else quickly enough. Instead of shunning the income, which should be deemed dubious by his strict standards, he sells off all the jewelry, resigns from his job, and settles into a life of leisure. In this, the story exposes Lantin’s hypocrisy completely. His love for his wife perishes with her “deception,” but he is not above enjoying the fruits of her lies. He even discovers a love for the theater, for which he harshly judged his late wife. And soon enough he remarries, but in a cunning twist, the effect is not what he had hoped.
Six months afterward he married again. His second wife was a very virtuous woman, with a violent temper. She caused him much sorrow.
As we see, the story challenges Lantin’s definitions of truth, happiness, and virtue in a wife; and he gets his just desserts for his double standards. The wife he considered “impure” was the one he was truly happy with, while the truly virtuous woman causes him “much sorrow,” as he deserves.
The above question wants to assess your writing ability and your imagination, for that reason I can't answer it for you, but I'll show you how to answer it.
First, you need to keep in mind that your story must end with the sentence "better late than never." This means that you should think of a story where something very important and expected by the characters took a while to happen, but it happened after a long wait.
After that, you should write your story in three parts, according to the following steps:
- Start: Introduce the characters and setting where the story takes place.
- Middle: Present the character's goals and desires and develop interactions between that character and others, as well as interactions with the setting. It's important that in this part of the story, you show what element this character is hoping to happen.
- Final: Show how agonizing this wait is for the character, but how rewarding it is on the day that element finally happens. Show how happy and relieved the character feels.
More information is below:
brainly.com/question/21210245?referrer=searchResults
