The argument is <em>that children go to school to learn not to teach their elders ,</em> where teachers can be included. Public schools are subsidised with taxes. Bearing this in mind, we may say that taxpayers send their children to school for them to learn not to teach. This was what the taxpayers did when <em>they themselves </em>were students . Therefore, t<em>axpayers send their children to school on the premise that, at their age, they needed to learn, not teach </em>is the reasoning of the argument.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Definitely Red and I've never heard of Witch of the North.
Answer:
Hi, I will write you whole essay at a cheap price in under 1 hr... email me at.. (<em>lyndertutors.gmai l.com</em>) for negotiations.
NOT A SCAM!
