The Civil War was by far the most catastrophic event to ever happen in the American South. There have been at least a few discussions on whether Abraham Lincoln and the Republicans should have prosecuted the Civil War, but surprisingly very little analysis on whether South Carolina's secession in 1860 was a strategically wise move in the context of the American debate on slavery and states' rights.
Secession was driven by the Southern planter class. For the purposes of this article, let's stipulate that the preservation of slavery and the plantation economy was the primary objective in seceding from the United States. If that was the point of secession, then the strategy was an obvious disaster
The following statement is true
A) The common name for the British Indian Empire was the "British Raj''
Derived from local languages, Raja meant King and Raj was meant to denote a Kingdom. After the British East India company gave the control of the country over the to British Throne, the area was then known as British Raj, or the Dominion of the British.
The British were the first power in history to consolidate power in as as far flung places as Aden in Yemen to Ragoon in Burma and develop a single government system around it calling it the British Raj.
The First capital was in Calcutta but it was later moved to Delhi in the West.
Answer:
It's not E neither D or C. I'd say A or B.
When you think about it A. is better.... Sorry. You should read the article/book
Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces Treaty
