Answer:
B.F Skinner´s studies led him to the idea that children learn language through operant conditioning. Applying positive reinforcement when a child uses a word correctly helps him to learn the association between that word and its meanings.
Explanation:
Celebrating a child for producing sounds that are close to a word reassures him and makes him repeat it. On the other hand, ignoring sounds that aren´t similar to any words makes the child forget about them. Based on his theory, Skinner developed a teaching process for language development based on the reinforcement of correct use of language. Let's imagine a child that says the word "milk" or a sound similar to that word. If he´s given milk after that and praised about it, he will learn the relationship between the word and its meaning and develop a language based on that information.
Answer:
primary
Explanation:
a secondary source would be if someone were to write a speech about the declaration of independence, the declaration of independence itself is a primary source
He lacked substantial capacity to appreciate<span> the wrongfulness of his conduct or obey the law.
The brains of people who had mental defect or disease do not function the way normal people do. This might cause them to not fully understand the concept of Empathy or guilt that normal people do when we're seeing other people being hurt.</span>
Answer: Stanley Milgram
Explanation: As Stanley Milgram himself stated, the essence of obedience to authority is when a person begins to perceive himself as a tool to fulfil the wishes of the authority, not his own wishes, so he sees all his actions and consequences of these actions as a result of the action of authority, not as a result of his will and responsibility. Milgram based his experiment on the conflict that arises between the state of obedience and the conscience of a person who subordinated to authority. The essence of the experiment concerned the responsibility of those who committed genocide during WWII, who claimed to have been merely obedient, i.e executing the orders of superiors, and based their defense on this claim.
This begs the question of whether or not they were complicit in the genocide.
The experiment was performed with pairs of participants where one was a "student" and the other was a "teacher", and where the student was connected to an electroshock electrode. Each time a student would give a wrong answer, the teacher would activate electricity through the electrodes and the student would experience an electric shock. With each wrong answer, the teacher would increase the level of electric shock. There are also some moderation in the experiment, such as a student would make a mistake on purpose, etc.
The conclusion is that ordinary people are generally willing to kill people, even if they are innocent in order to execute the orders of superiors, recognised as authority. It is considered that when it comes to authority, all its orders are justified and legal. So it is moral and proper to follow the orders of authority, whatever it may be.
