1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
lisov135 [29]
3 years ago
7

I used waste my time ..... TV

English
2 answers:
Nitella [24]3 years ago
6 0

Me too. Want to become roommates lol (~ ̄▽ ̄)~

ASHA 777 [7]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

LOL

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Plz help! This is for the crucible, btw
riadik2000 [5.3K]

Answer: The phenomenon of witchcraft therefore highlights both the need to believe in stories and the capacity to see through them.

Explanation:

Witchcraft is often thought of, wrongly, as a thing of the past. In fact, it continues to be taken seriously by people all over the world. But because the subject of this study is, specifically, early modern witchcraft and its dramatic representation, it will be necessary to clarify what the term ‘witch’ meant within this specific context. As several early modern authors on witchcraft argued, the meaning of the word has changed over time. The senses in which ancient Latin or Greek authors used the terms that are typically translated as ‘witch’ are distinct from the senses in which sixteenth- and seventeenth- century English people used those terms, as well as from the senses in which the word might be understood in the present. The situation is further complicated by the variety of different understandings of what defined witchcraft in early modern England. Accusations of witchcraft tended to focus on the issue of maleficium – the harm it caused – while theoretical writings on witchcraft were usually more interested in the witches’ supposed pact with the devil. Magical power might be conceived of as inherent in the witch herself, in the objects or words she used, in the spirit with which she bargained, or as merely illusory. Disagreement over these and other issues continued throughout the period during which witchcraft was a criminal offence.

One assumption of this study – widely but not universally shared today – is that magic operating outside the laws of nature and bargains with the devil are not and never were possible, and that people, both past and present, who believed these things to be possible were, and are, mistaken. Consequently, there can be no definitive description of what a witch was, only a description of what a given person or group of people imagined a witch to be. Assuming that witches did not exist in the sense that they were often believed to, it is hardly surprising that early modern society did not reach a consensus on what witchcraft was; the subject was debated for centuries and eventually faded from public discourse without ever having been resolved. No work on early modern witchcraft, therefore, can ignore the fact that there was a wide range of opinion on the matter. Furthermore, it would be misleading simply to rely on an exhaustive list of the various opinions (even assuming all of these were documented). Many early modern people appear to have been quite flexible in what they were prepared to believe, and ideas about witchcraft were often fluid rather than fixed points of reference against which real-life situations might be judged. Many people were open to persuasion and argument, evidence was often open to interpretation, and whether a given proposition about an alleged witch was accepted or not might depend on a variety of local factors. Nonetheless, some broad generalisations are possible. One important point is that the late medieval and early modern period in Europe saw the emergence of a specifically Christian conception of witchcraft. Witchcraft belief, and laws against witchcraft, had existed long before this. But from the fifteenth century onwards, important people within the late medieval Church began to accept the idea that witches were evil and genuinely powerful servants of the devil, and could therefore be punished as a species of heretic. Perhaps the most important texts here are the Malleus Maleficarum (1486) of Institoris and Sprenger and the decree made by Innocent VIII, which lent papal authority to the subsequent witch-hunts in Germany. Always controversial, always contested, this idea nevertheless spread through Europe and led to a period of intense witchcraft persecution, peaking in the late sixteenth century. This conception of witchcraft is described in a variety of theological, medical, and philosophical writings and constitutes an important part of the body of work known as demonology. Demonological views of witchcraft frequently form the intellectual context of this study.

7 0
2 years ago
Nick says, "there are only the pursued, the pursuing, the busy and the tired." what does nick mean and how does each character i
attashe74 [19]
Daisy is pursued Gatsby is pursuing, Tom and Daisy are tired.
8 0
3 years ago
How can sports strengthen the Filipino family?
yKpoI14uk [10]
Because it can help them bond and have fun together but i dont think it matters the race i think in general its good for a family . Hope i helped
4 0
3 years ago
What does auther want to express in the following? Explain in your own words
Liono4ka [1.6K]

Answer:

Another example of 1) English Patriotism and 2) Henry trying to be "one of the guys,." He's offering them the chance to be elevated to the status of gentleman because of their bravery. Can also be compare this to the way in which the French discuss the battle of Harfleur, which is over-confident and basically talks about how they're going to take advantage of how weak the English army is. Talks about how they'll get to show their scars and remember what happens today, years from now==manhood. Henry implicits elevates the men he's fighting alongside to his own level of nobility-- so is he pushing himself down, or pulling the other soldiers up?

8 0
3 years ago
What is the relationship between honey and a flower?
lara31 [8.8K]

The relationship between bees and flowers is called symbiosis.

Symbiosis: A relationship between two organisms in which the organisms benefit from one another.

How Bees Benefit Flowers.

Bees pollinate flowers, which means they transfer the pollen made by one flower of one plant to the flower of another plant. Bees do not purposely do this. Actually, the bees are trying to collect the pollen to take back to their hives. In the process of going from one flower to another as they collect pollen, some pollen is picked up from one flower and accidentally dropped on another flower. Pollination results in the formation of seeds.

Hope I helped :)

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How do you think writers can use verbs to improve their writing?
    14·1 answer
  • What is the best definition of setting
    11·1 answer
  • Read the two sentences. During the American Revolution, George Washington proved to be a gifted military strategist. The America
    9·2 answers
  • Write a letter to a your friend, four reasons why u want him to come to your school
    6·1 answer
  • What are other common characteristics of a tragic hero? Mark all that apply.
    5·2 answers
  • Can someone please write me a fable i will mark brainliest!
    13·1 answer
  • 4. How does seeing and hearing this speech improve your understanding of it, as
    5·1 answer
  • I need a paragraph on how social media is good for teens in terms of entertainment. Help and I might give you brainliest if it’s
    10·1 answer
  • Why were haunted houses first created in the United States and who were they made for?
    11·1 answer
  • ——- eagle has excellent eyesight. Which article?
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!