Answer:
Humanity’s environmental footprint has increased, but at a much slower rate compared to population and economic growth because of more efficient use of natural resources, reports Mongabay
Explanation:
There is a long-standing dispute on the extent to which population growth causes environmental degradation. Most studies on this link have so far analyzed cross-country data, finding contradictory results. However, these country-level analyses suffer from the high level of dissimilarity between world regions and strong collinearity of population growth, income, and other factors. We argue that regional-level analyses can provide more robust evidence, isolating the population effect from national particularities such as policies or culture. We compile a dataset of 1062 regions within 22 European countries and analyze the effect from population growth on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and urban land use change between 1990 and 2006. Data are analyzed using panel regressions, spatial econometric models, and propensity score matching where regions with high population growth are matched to otherwise highly similar regions exhibiting significantly less growth. We find a considerable effect from regional population growth on carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions and urban land use increase in Western Europe. By contrast, in the new member states in the East, other factors appear more important.
British intelligence suggested that Bush administration had "cooked the books" to justify the invasion of Iraq, <u>a. U.S. media outlets devoted little attention to the story, television outlets devoted heavy coverage to the story, but print outlets did not virtually all</u>
<u>Explanation:</u>
Media serves as a watchdog over government in in a democratic society. <u>"Invasion of Iraq"</u> was done during the administration of President George Bush.
British intelligence decided to conduct research on Invasion of Iraq. They did lot of investigation and finally found that the Bush’s government “cooked the books" to justify the invasion of Iraq.
When they submitted this report, the media outlets in the United States showed less attention to the story.
Answer:
C. gave the president authority to use military personnel to collect tariffs.
Explanation:
The Force act was enacted on March 2, 1833. It authorized the president of the U.S to enforce federal laws on collection of import duties from the states that refuse to pay using the country's military. The bill was during the nullification crisis. This arose because south Carolina had said it would treat the Tariff Acts of 1828 and 1832 as null and void. The definite goal it had was forcing South Carolina to pay federal import tariffs.
Some experts think that the midlife crisis is a product of Western cultures because of their focus on youth
Answer:
D. three-quarters
Explanation:
A. is not the right answer. It is too low.
B. is not the right answer. France is provided with more nuclear power.
C. is not the correct answer. This percent is too much.
<u> D. is the right answer. A total of 75% of France’s electrical power is provided by nuclear power, meaning three-quarters of the country. </u><u>France is one of the world’s biggest consumers of electricity,</u> which is why they set the goal to lower the consumption of nuclear energy by a quarter in the next 35 years.
