All categories

3 years ago

Say it with me now...... LEESSSSSSSS GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!

Business

2 answers:

lorasvet [3.4K]3 years ago

6 0

Answer:

Say it with me now......

LEESSSSSSSS GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!

erastova [34]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

LEESSSSSSSS GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!!

Explanation:

But 4 real doe u need help wit anything

You might be interested in

Yellowstone Corporation has just announced the repurchase of $125,000 of its stock. The company has 39,000 shares outstanding an

puteri [66]

Answer:

The price–earnings ratio after the repurchase is 22.18

Explanation:

First calculate Numbers of new shares

New Shares = Old Shares - ( Repurchased Shares / Price per share )

New Shares = 39,000 - ( $125,000 / $76.09 )

New Shares = 39,000 - 1,642.79

New Shares = 37,357.21 shares

New compute the old earning

Old Earning = EPS x Numbers of old shares = $3.29 x 39,000 = $128,310

New compute revised Earning per share

Revised EPS = Earning / New shares = $128,310 / 37,357.21 shares = $3.43

Now we need to calculate the Price earning ratio

P/E Ratio = Price per share / Revised earning per share = $76.09 / $3.43 = 22.18 times

7 0

3 years ago

What can a food surplus lead to?

gayaneshka [121]

A food surplus in a society can lead to many different things. But based on the principles of supply and demand a surplus of food should lead to a reduction in the price of food, because the quantity supplied is most likely higher than the quantity demanded. In addition a food surplus could lead a country or companies to sell their food surplus internationally or to "dump" the goods on another country or market by selling the goods for a very cheap price most likely lower than the price of the good in that market prior to the entry of this new producer or country with the food surplus.

4 0

3 years ago

The Four Tops Company began operations on January 2nd. During the first 3 months of operations, only 3 jobs were worked on. Job

lianna [129]

Answer:

$81,500

Explanation:

As per the data given in the question,

The computation of the cost of goods manufactured is shown below:

Before that first we need to do following calculations

Direct material = $12,000 + $23,000

= $35,000

Direct labor = $11,000 + $20,000

= $31,000

Overhead applied = 50% of direct labor

= 50%×$31,000

= $15,500

Cost of goods manufactured = Direct material + Direct labor + Overhead applied

= $35,000 +$31,000 + $15,500

= $81,500

8 0

3 years ago

Megan: most people recognize that the budget deficit has been rising considerably over the last century. we need to find the bes

goldfiish [28.3K]

The answer is "<u>The disagreement between these economists is most likely due to differences in scientific judgments."</u>

It isn't surprising that as the inquiry proceeds with, researchers at times differ about the bearing in which truth lies. Economists regularly differ for a similar reason. Economics is a youthful science, and there is still much to be educated. Economists here and there differ in light of the fact that they have distinctive hunches about the legitimacy of elective hypotheses or about the extent of critical parameters that measure how monetary factors are connected.

8 0

4 years ago

Outside the United States and the United Kingdom, concentrated ownership of the company is more the exception than the rule. dif

rusak2 [61]

Answer:

Diffused ownership of the company is more the exception than the rule.

Explanation:

Outside the United States and the United Kingdom, diffused ownership is more the exception than the rule mostly because the forms of diffuse corporate ownership tend to have an American or British origin, and from the U.S. and the U.K., they expand to other countries with time.

For example, Limited Liability Companies is a type of company with diffused ownership, and has been exported with different names to other countries, becoming more popular with time.

6 0

3 years ago