I think the answer would be A
Explanation:
Author is giving a lot of details of Washwoman and Washwoman's son and we can say that their characters are two opposites.
- Washwoman is one very old and small woman that is doing her work as it should and she is not ashamed of it like her son. Her son is not inviting her to his wedding because he is ashamed of his mother and that is saying a lot about him.
- He is appearing as one selfish child without feelings. His mother is not bitter because of him, she is a good and hard working woman. Also, the author is showing their financial situation, Washwoman's son is wealthy and she is just a hard working woman who is showing a lot of effort.
The Real problem is that Brad likes to Micromanage and use his authority to flex on his subordinates without any real reason.
Brad would criticize employees in front of folks to set an example.
Tell Senior Employees how to do their job without any reason as for why this might help but instead told them because "I said so"
Don't micromanage and trust your employees to work efficiently without being watched. If corrections or adjustments need to be made have solid conversations with facts, tips, and tricks to keep your employees engaged as well as motivated. Synergize.
If these new tactics are being used productivity may increase. If productivity is increased and customer satisfaction is up then working an incentive program as bonuses may reward your staff for a job well done. As an additive to the solution always complimenting your workforce on the hard work they've been doing keeps morale up and their personal spirits high.
I would recommend all that I've stated before because I've may it very clear that if these steps are taken productivity, morale, and trust will work you for you and people with because they can see that a leader takes charge and inspires those that hear them and as they a leader leads by example and not fear and scrutiny.
B using a fork to eat food
