The American artist protested that he lacked freedom. In my view, he had too much. He took America for granted. If he had been i
n China twenty years ago; I would have taught him a good lesson. After re-reading paragraph 7, what is a logical inference you can make about the “good lesson” the narrator wants to teach the American artist? (RL.1) Word count: 0
The logical inference a person can make about the “good lesson” the narrator wants to teach the American artist is:
<u>He would have shown him how there was no freedom in China twenty years ago</u>
<u />
According to the given question, the narrator says that the American artist is making unnecessary protests about having so little freedom.
This shows an irony that he does not appreciate the freedom he enjoys and feels he lacks freedom.
As a result of this, we can see that the logical inference we can make about the good lesson which he wants to teach the American artist is that he would show him how little freedom there was in China twenty years ago and how he enjoys freedom.
It's actually a poem. "If you see me getting smaller, I'm <em>leaving</em>, don't be <em>grieving</em>, just gotta get away from here. If you see me getting smaller, don't worry, and no hurry, <em>I've got the right to disappear</em>." The narrator has decided to commitsu icide.
