The greater the electronegativity difference, the moreionic<span> the </span>bond<span> is. </span>Bonds<span> that are partly </span>ionic<span> are called</span>polar<span> covalent </span>bonds<span>. </span>Nonpolar<span> covalent </span>bonds<span>, with equal sharing of the </span>bond<span> electrons, arise when the electronegativities of the two atoms are equal</span>
A negative charge that exists because of a covalent bond with hydrogen.
<span>Answer: “Comparing the mitochondrial DNA between different eukaryotes to see how closely they are related.”</span>
The endosymbiotic theory focuses on the origin of two eukaryotic organelles that have bacteria characteristics (mitochondria in animals and chloroplasts in plants). These two are s are believed to have developed from symbiotic bacteria.
<span>In designing an experiment that would support the endosymbiotic theory, the statement that would provide the best evidence is comparing mitochondrial DNA between different eukaryotes to see how closely they are related.</span>
A mutation is a permanent change in the DNA sequence of a gene. This can be beneficial if the change gives a new function to or improves the function of that gene.
<span>The above is a definition. But one must really define "beneficial". Some regard it as beneficial if it helps the specific individual who has it. Others would think it beneficial if it produced some survival advantage that insured more descendents for that individual. </span>
<span>It is the difference between a mutation that allowed for greater athletic ability, but a decreased desire for offspring, versus a more moderate athletic enhancement, but a greater desire for offspring. </span>
<span>The small percentage of ways to improve an organism, versus the near infinite ways of harming the organism, mean that most mutations are not going to be beneficial. At best, they will be "inconsequential" - such as a new shade of eye color, or a mole on a section of your skin. </span>
The populist notion of "powers" that can come from mutations is wildly inaccurate. Even assuming a minor power like the ability to see infra red radiation would take thousands upon thousands of mutations over vast amounts of time. A mutation for blindness is far more likely.
<span>It should also be noted that the traditional model of evolutionary theory no longer applies to man. We don't allow changes in our environment, and without such changes, there is no need for one trait more than another to predominate. After all, it is irrelevent that a mutation might allow for greater speed in running, when everyone drives a car.</span>
Answer:
1. Many varieties were available in alternative forms of a character
2. Varieties were available in pure from start please true that is produced the same type of generation after generation
3. Peace and normally self pollinated but self pollination could be prevented by removing corresponding a productive path main parts demons and female bad kapil's after flour and could as well be crossed
pollinated artificially
