The correct answer is unemployed people
People get paid when they are sick from their companies while they are sick. Men of working age or people who need vacations don't get special benefits. Regular paychecks are nowadays paid to those unemployed and those disabled, so as to help them so they don't starve or anything similar.
I believe the answer is autonomy.
Autonomy based argument to do euthanasia is based on the fact that we give freedom to all people to do whatever we want to our body.
For example, if the patient is experiencing an excruciating pain from bone cancer (to the point where morphine could no longer help), Euthanasia may seem like a rational option.
Answer:
The primary distinction is that state and local courts are authorized to hear cases involving the laws and citizens of their state or city, while federal courts decide lawsuits between citizens of different states, cases against the United States, and cases involving specific federal laws
Explanation:
Answer:
The Categorical Imperative, was the philosophical view of moral actions and behavior in people, according to Immanuel Kant, its creator. Basically, this philosophy states that there are universal truths that cannot be altered, or changed, by absolutely anything: not by culture, not by genetics, not by learning, and much less by the beliefs of the majority. A truth is what it is, and it must be obeyed as the utmost "right", not merely what is "good".
In contrast to Kant´s philosophy, which was born from Kant´s displeasure with how the society of his time behaved, it was hypothetical imperatives that would dictate how people needed to behave to be considered moral. These hypothetical imperatives were truths that were dependent on certain circumstances, and on empirical knowledge, and therefore, were bound to change given certain conditions. This was something that Kant could not tolerate and thus fed his need to create his Categorical Imperative philosophy.
However, even during his own time Kant´s philosophy was criticized and questioned. And one person who did that was Benjamin Constant, who proposed the idea of the Inquiring Murdered. He said that if Kant´s philosophy of moral behavior was absolute, then when a murdered asked a question, he should be given the TRUTH, because that woud be what was universally held as morally right. But if that truth led to the murderer finding his victim, then, what did the philosophy told people was right to do? This questioning showed even Kant that there were instances in which due to the nature of the situation, lying would not be held as wrong, but rather, as the correct measure to act morally.
Answer:
Alexander Hamilton
Explanation:
I believe this is correct. Apologies if not but I believe so.
