Answer:
A) "She did not feel bad when Martha Spoke"
Explanation:
Because at the beginning of the excerpt, it says "She didn't become irritated when Martha talked; in fact, she seemed to like hearing her."
Answer:
A). Paying money to attend a conference about climate change in order to do research for an article.
C). Ending an investigation because it may lead to violence and disunity in a local community.
D). Interviewing the CEOs of two insurance companies that are competing against each other.
Explanation:
Ethically acceptable scenarios would be associated with the scenarios that are morally accurate and corresponds to impartiality, responsibility, credibility, truth, and ethics.
As per the question, options A, C, and D would be considered as ethically acceptable scenarios as they correspond to unbiased, authentic, and credible information to be presented to the viewers. <em>'paying money to attend a research' would assist in offering a wider dimension and credible information while 'ending an investigation as it may violence and disunity' exemplify 'responsibility' which is the key code of ethics and 'interviewing two CEO's' would help present an unbiased representation.</em> Thus, <u>options A, C, and D</u> are correct.
Answer:
No
Explanation:
Because the rooster doesn't control the suns rising if he didn't crow the sun would still rise
Answer:
The Greek root arch means “rule.” This Greek root is the word origin of a fair number of English vocabulary words, including matriarch, patriarch, and oligarchy.
Hope this helps!
I think the correct answer from the choices listed above is option 3. The excerpt from Part 2 of The Odyssey that best establishes Odysseus’s weakness is the line " I wished to see the caveman, what he had to offer—." Hope this answers the question. Have a nice day.
