A: It tells readers there is something important happening on that asteroid.
The two needing to get back to the asteroid in two weeks' time shows that something is happening on that asteroid. We don't have any evidence to say that Kenniston has not been trying hard enough. Also, there is nothing to suggest that they have to get back because they are not where they should be. Lastly, there is nothing in this detail that suggests Holk Or is going to take over the planet.
The main difference is that the article suggests the murder was likely committed by robbers, while the excerpt suggests a wider range of suspects.
<h3>How can this difference be noticed?</h3>
- Through the reading of texts.
- By identifying the characterization of the killer.
- By comparing the diction between the texts.
- Through the purpose of each text.
With the reading of both texts, it is possible to see that the article tends to present the murder in a more objective and specific way, while the excerpt wants to show that the murder was more complex and with layers of difficult determination.
More information about diction at the link:
brainly.com/question/14571737
Post the picture next time please
The correct answer is "I think you left your biology notebook on the bleachers yesterday"
Explanation:
The words "your" and "you're" are homophones because their pronunciation is the same and they are written similarly. However, they have a different meaning because the word "your" shows possession, while the word "you're" (you are) comprises a subject and the verb to be. In this context, the only sentence that is completely correct and uses these homophones correctly is "I think you left your biology notebook on the bleachers yesterday" because in this the word "your" is used to show possession, which matches its meaning.