Wait is this about the movie Coraline or is this about a historical topic because the topic you picked is social studies but my brain automatically said the movie Coraline
The Ancient Minoans lived in modern-day southern Iraq. The economy of the Minoan mercantilist civilizations depended upon trading goods such as saffron, grapes/wine, pottery, oil, precious metals and figs with Syria, Cyprus, Mesopotamia, Egypt, Greece, and the Iberian Peninsula.
Minoans were successful with this strong and mostly agricultural trade due to the production of roads and a strong (and greatly feared) navy. The economic trade of agricultural goods aided the Ancient Minoans in spreading their culture, exerting power and influence, and distributing goods both at home between the palace to citizens and in foreign lands.
Answer:
This is an example of masked-man fallacy.
Explanation:
The masked-man is a fallacy in which two people or objects are mistakenly considered to be either identical or completely different. The most common example used to explain it is the following:
I know who Joshua is.
I don't know who the masked man is.
Therefore, Joshua is not the masked man.
In the example above, Joshua and the masked man are considered different, unrelated. <u>In the situation we are analyzing here, the opposite happens. To reach the conclusion that Tamiko stole Maya's shoes, we are making the huge mistake of not considering any other possibility. Tamiko could very well have an identical-looking pair of shoes; Maya could have lent Tamiko her shoes and forgotten about it, and so on. Therefore, assuming that the shoes are the same, that they belong to Maya and have been stolen, is a result of wrong reasoning and an example of masked-man fallacy.</u>
Answer:
The excerpt informs the reader that there were likely inaccuracies in the report provided to the court.
Explanation:
The above statement most appropriately relates that how the author's purpose of the given frame and the excerpt are distinct. It reveals that 'the excerpt aims to inform the readers about the imprecision involved in the report that was presented to the court' as the report says 'Faryad had pellets in his left arm' which is logically false if he was sitting on the bicycle with Iqbal who had in the right side and hence, the frame asserts a different story. That's how both are different from each other.
I think that it's 4, i'm pretty aure
