1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
kap26 [50]
2 years ago
11

Understand Harriet Tubman’s _______ through her actions and the poems’ descriptions of her.

History
1 answer:
Ad libitum [116K]2 years ago
5 0

Answer:

I think the answer is life

You might be interested in
What was an achievement of the Zhou dynasty?
oee [108]

A.

introduction of coins


hope it helps :D

7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is one way that King Tutankhamen reversed Akhenatons religious reforms​?
Tasya [4]

Answer:

He reopened the old temples

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Which general led the Byzantine troops against the vandals and Ostrogoths under the region of emperor Justinian
sesenic [268]
Hey Name's Jessy. I hope, I answer your question.

The general who was led "Nika".  The one who was against was "Sulyman I".
<span />
8 0
3 years ago
Describe Andrew Jackson’s presidency. What actions during his presidency still affect today’s policies in the United States?
hichkok12 [17]
President Andrew Jackson had founded the January 8, 1828 and demolished the Second bank in 1833. He also supported many individual “for the people” policies.
4 0
2 years ago
Which two laws did the Supreme Court declare to be unconstitutional?
Ulleksa [173]

The correct answers are A and C.

A) National Recovery Administration: On 27 May 1935, in the court case of Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, the Supreme Court held the mandatory codes section of NIRA unconstitutional,[20] because it attempted to regulate commerce that was not interstate in character, and that the codes represented an unacceptable delegation of power from the legislature to the executive. Chief Justice Charles Evans Hughes wrote for a unanimous Court in invalidating the industrial "codes of fair competition" which the NIRA enabled the President to issue. The Court held that the codes violated the United States Constitution's separation of powers as an impermissible delegation of legislative power to the executive branch. The Court also held that the NIRA provisions were in excess of congressional power under the Commerce Clause.

The Court distinguished between direct effects on interstate commerce, which Congress could lawfully regulate, and indirect, which were purely matters of state law. Though the raising and sale of poultry was an interstate industry, the Court found that the "stream of interstate commerce" had stopped in this case: Schechter's slaughterhouses bought chickens only from intrastate wholesalers and sold to intrastate buyers. Any interstate effect of Schechter was indirect, and therefore beyond federal reach.

Specifically, the Court invalidated regulations of the poultry industry promulgated under the authority of the National Industrial Recovery Act of 1933, including price and wage fixing, as well as requirements regarding a whole shipment of chickens, including unhealthy ones, which has led to the case becoming known as "the sick chicken case." The ruling was one of a series which overturned some New Deal legislation between January 1935 and January 1936, and which ultimately caused Roosevelt to attempt to pack the Court with judges that were in favor of the New Deal.

Subsequent to the decision, the remainder of Title I was extended until April 1, 1936, by joint resolution of Congress (49 Stat. 375), June 14, 1935, and NRA was reorganized by E.O. 7075, June 15, 1935, to facilitate its new role as a promoter of industrial cooperation and to enable it to produce a series of economic studies, which the National Recovery Review Board was already doing. Many of the labor provisions reappeared in the Wagner Act of 1935.

C) Agricultural Adjustment Administration: On January 6, 1936, the Supreme Court decided in United States v. Butler that the act was unconstitutional for levying this tax on the processors only to have it paid back to the farmers. Regulation of agriculture was deemed a state power. As such, the federal government could not force states to adopt the Agricultural Adjustment Act due to lack of jurisdiction. However, the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938 remedied these technical issues and the farm program continued.



7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of these is an opinion ? A Fort Jackson has its own grocery store, as well as a school for children of soldiers. B Foods t
    9·1 answer
  • Who was the 4th presedent of usa
    10·2 answers
  • Latin suffix ary and arium
    12·2 answers
  • Which innovation of the Industrial Revolution led to a decrease in the price of coal from Manchester?
    9·1 answer
  • Who was Nicholas Novikov, and when did he write the Soviet Ambassador telegram?
    11·1 answer
  • Who presided over the Congress in the Congress of Vienna
    13·1 answer
  • Convert the following:
    9·1 answer
  • 8.) After which event(s) did the Confederate States of America surrender?
    7·2 answers
  • CAN SOMEONE HELP ME PLEASE
    8·1 answer
  • In order to represent our three-dimensional Earth in a two-dimensional image, we must use a __________.
    8·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!