Garrett Hardin argues for a very harsh thesis: we simply should not provide aid to people in poor countries. His argument is consequentialist: he claims that the net result of doing so would be negative -- would in fact be courting large-scale disaster. One of the things that we will notice about Hardin's essay, however, is that whether he is right or wrong, he paints with a very broad brush. This makes it a good essay for the honing of your philosophical skills; you should notice that there are many places where the reasoning procees with less than total care. Hardin begins with metaphors. He points out that while the metaphor of earth as a grand spaceship has a certain popularity (or did 23 years ago) .
Answer:
Well at first everyone was depending on Casey and he did not want to let them down but the pitcher had other ideas, Um im not really sure about anything else sorry I tried
Explanation:
Answer:
4 is the answer, hope this helps :)
Explanation:
To look at him because that’s the answer
Answer:
(C)
Explanation: It uses the word 'like' to compare the huge stone and a coffin.
