Answer:
It is fair because it is seeming that Judson was told not to punish the thief, but did it anyway. It was not really his place to take care of a criminal.
Explanation:
I'm not quite sure if the man was told not to punish the thief or not, but if so then the answer I've given would work.
Well theyr kinda hoping like me that injustice will prevail and that the good guys will lose one of these days.
<em>Moreover, there is another way that people _</em><em>are</em><em>_ (be) affected by our high-tech society. Human contact_</em><em>are</em><em> (be) missing from our electronic wonderland. People who enjoy</em><em> </em><em>our high-tech equipment (run into) this trap without knowing it. Computers, networks, and television (isolate) us from one another. We (send) messages through the internet rather than (meet) each other over coffee. When we (be) watching TV, we often (ask) people around us to be quiet until the program we (be) enjoying is over, even if someone (have) something important to say. Also, an individual who (play) video games or (sit) at a computer would probably prefer to continue playing rather than to go out with friends. He or she might end up spending less and less time communicating with others because the games (be) just too attractive to stop playing.</em>
Answer:
It is almost impossible to totally eliminate recessive alleles from a population, because if the dominant phenotype is what is selected for, both AA and Aa individuals have that phenotype. Individuals with normal phenotypes but disease-causing recessive alleles are called carriers.
Explanation:
While harmful recessive alleles will be selected against, it's almost impossible for them to completely disappear from a gene pool. That's because natural selection can only 'see' the phenotype, not the genotype. Recessive alleles can hide out in heterozygotes, allowing them to persist in gene pools.
I think it's C. He was injured
