1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
LenKa [72]
2 years ago
12

Compare the role of women in the ottoman society and mughal society

History
1 answer:
irakobra [83]2 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Women in the Ottoman Empire enjoyed a diverse range of rights depending on the time period, as well as their religion and class. The Ottoman Empire, first as a Turkoman beylik, and then a multi-ethnic, multi-religious empire, was ruled in accordance to the qanun, the semi-secular body of law enacted by Ottoman sultans. Furthermore, the relevant religious scriptures of its many confessional communities played a major role in the legal system, for the majority of Ottoman women, these were the Quran and Hadith as interpreted by Islamic jurists, often termed sharia. Most Ottoman women were permitted to participate in the legal system, purchase and sell property, inherit and bequeath wealth, and participate in other financial activities, rights which were unusual in the rest of Europe until the 19th century.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
In document A, what view does Andrew Carnegie take toward organized labor?
Leya [2.2K]
I need to see document A
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How does the writer of the Bloomberg business article show that he is attempting to be objective?
dimaraw [331]

Answer:

a. he consults well-known, credible sources in his research.

Explanation:

The attempt to be objective is trying to search for as many sources as possible, experts in the matter and trying to portray both sides of the story, this way objectiveness can be achieved, by writting and consulting credible well-known sources is part of that job.

3 0
3 years ago
How did other european monarchs feel about the french revolution
Vlad [161]
<span>they opposed it because they feared the revolution would spread</span>
3 0
3 years ago
1. Fill in the chart with information about policies, successes, and failures under Lenin and Stalin.
OLga [1]

Answer: Lenin was professional revolutionary (and a Marxist theorist) inspired by 19th-century Western thinkers and socialist movements. He organized and led Russian bolshevist revolution (1917) - which attracted immediately attention in all the world and soon was followed by worldwide foundations of Communist parties. So Lenin can be viewed as an international figure. Lenin also believed  (because of prophetic aspect of Marxist theory) in world Communist revolution and was ready to export Bolshevist revolution to other countries. During Lenin´s rule (17-24) there was a believe in a possibility to scientifically mold human beings in more perfect humans ....so Bolshevists invited Freudians and together worked on growing more perfect generations (kindergartens, schools etc.), under Stalin all that finished. The main failure of Stalin was his incapacity to bring up a his follower (there was a big rivalry and later conflict between Stalin and Trotsky). Joseph Stalin came to power in mid-1920s (coup within the top ranks of the Communist party) and continued in power until his death 1953. During his reign USSR was even more engaged in the export of its ideology. Stalin is considered a criminal because of his "Great Purge" in 1930s (34-9) but because of "Big famine" (1932-34) especially in Ukraine and North Caucasus. He took care of his Personality Cult. Stalin´s USSR is a totalitarian regime. After his death his personality cult was revealed and criticized. During Lenin´s rule and Stalin´s rule ...there was an intense industrialization, investments in industry. Stalin won the WW II ...that is also noteworthy. During reign of both leaders USSR became very attractive for a big part of European left and also in overseas (especially South America).

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
In Roman society , once children were grown &amp; married they were allowed to own their own property.
kupik [55]

In Roman society , once children were grown & married they were allowed to own their own property.

Answer: True

<u>Explanation:</u>

In Roman society, the marriage in ancient Rome was allowed from the age of 25 to 50 years for males and 20 to 50 years for females. They were to be married in almost equal or nearby status. The soldier could not marry a citizen, as that would be void marriage.

The senators and freed-woman cannot marry, or marrying to slaves were prohibited. The children on growing up used to marry, own his own property with the making of the house over it to keep his wife.

Although the legal rights of the married woman stayed with the father. The woman could also pass the inherited property or may own land rights.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • PLEASE HELP!!!!!!!!
    6·2 answers
  • What was the main reason why the United States agreed to support Israel?
    6·2 answers
  • If Roosevelt’s judicial reform had been passed, how would new judges have been appointed? on the basis of the years of experienc
    5·2 answers
  • Which country participated in the Olympic Games, even though many Greeks felt they were a bit barbaric?
    14·1 answer
  • The Code of Hammurabi and the Twelve Tables of Rome were similar in that
    7·1 answer
  • Multiple choose question Why did the Renaissance begin in the Italian city-states?
    5·1 answer
  • What type of grass grows naturally on the Great Plains?
    5·1 answer
  • What was the Holocaust?
    14·1 answer
  • What did Martin Luther’s 95 Theses lead to?
    7·1 answer
  • Section 3<br> Who does Martin Luther King, Jr.<br> confess he is gravely disappointed<br> with?
    14·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!